Home / Comparisons / Saucony Peregrine vs Hoka Speedgoat

Saucony Peregrine 16 vs Hoka Speedgoat 7 (2026 Comparison)

Saucony Peregrine 16 vs Hoka Speedgoat 7

Torn between the Saucony Peregrine and the Hoka Speedgoat? Now that’s an interesting matchup!

Cushioning and Construction

The Speedgoat 7 is clearly the more maximalist of the two: 40 mm at the heel versus 32 mm for the Peregrine 16. You feel that 8 mm difference underfoot right away.

Comparison
Weight
Drop
Stack (heel/forefoot)
Cushioning
Plate
Foam
Responsiveness
Best for
Surface
Lugs
Outsole rubber
275 g
4 mm
32 / 28 mm
Balanced
Rock plate
PWRRUN
Moderate
Training, racing ยท Short trail
Trail
4 mm
Vibram MegaGrip
264 g
5 mm
40 / 35 mm
Balanced
No plate
Supercritical EVA
Moderate
All-round trail ยท Ultras
Trail
5 mm
Vibram MegaGrip

Hoka uses a modern supercritical EVA foam with excellent shock absorption, ideal for piling up the miles in ultras. The Peregrine still relies on the older TPU-based PWRRUN foam, even though Saucony adds 4 mm of cushioning over the v15.

The result: a plusher, more protective ride from Hoka, while the Peregrine feels firmer and closer to the ground.

Both keep a low drop: 5 mm for Hoka, 4 mm for Saucony.

Weight and Responsiveness

The Peregrine 16 weighs 275 g / 9.7 oz in a US 8.5 (EU 42) versus 264 g / 9.3 oz for the Speedgoat 7, despite having less cushioning.

On responsiveness, neither one is chasing pure performance. The Speedgoat keeps a slight edge thanks to its Meta-Rocker, which smooths the transition forward.

Grip

Both use Vibram MegaGrip with Traction Lug technology.

The Speedgoat keeps its 5 mm heart-shaped lugs. The Peregrine moves to 4 mm multidirectional chevrons (down from 5 mm).

Grip is excellent on both, with a slight edge to the Hoka in mud.

Lockdown and Protection

The Speedgoat 7 offers more protection thanks to its forefoot reinforcement and sturdy build, which feels especially planted on technical terrain.

The Peregrine 16 holds up well with its very tough Trail-Ready Upper and heat-bonded overlays. Its fit is stretchier and suits wide feet better, while the Speedgoat can feel narrow for some runners (at least in its standard width).

Use

The Speedgoat 7 shines through its versatility and long-distance comfort, ultras included. The Peregrine 16 is better suited to short and middle distances and to runners who want more ground feel.

Both models are durable, with sturdy builds. Historically, though, the Speedgoat has always been a step above (the Peregrine had heel issues on previous versions).

Verdict

The Speedgoat 7 is the go-to all-rounder for long distances and technical terrain.

The Peregrine 16 remains an excellent choice for shorter trail runs, with firm cushioning and a ride closer to the ground.

Kevin Le Gall

Kevin Le Gall

Kevin is the founder and editor of Runner's Lab. He started running in 2015 and completed his first marathon in Rotterdam in 2016. He's also worked for Under Armour from 2016 to 2018 and helped launch their running collection in Europe (in particular the HOVR shoes). In addition, Kevin is a 300-hour certified yoga teacher (Sivananda) and uses this experience to run more mindfully with a focus on well-being over performance.

Leave a Comment