The Hoka Clifton 11 and the Hoka Clifton Pro were released together, and the question many runners are asking is simple: which version should you choose? Both are high-cushion shoes for daily training.
On paper, they’re twins: same weight, same stack height, same drop. The whole difference plays out in the midsole.
The Clifton 11 stays true to its CMEVA foam, a conventional compression-molded EVA. The Pro moves up to the ProGlide+ series, with SCF EVA foam, a supercritical new-generation EVA, a step above in technology.
Ride-wise, the Clifton 11 offers a well-balanced feel and very good shock absorption, but its responsiveness stays limited when you pick up the pace.
The Pro is firmer on impact because of its very dense SCF foam. The responsiveness is clearly better, with a more pronounced Meta Rocker profile for smooth transitions.
Don’t expect a super shoe either: the energy return doesn’t stand comparison with the PEBA or A-TPU foams of shoes like the Asics Superblast 3 or the Puma Deviate Pure Nitro.
In terms of fit, both engineered mesh uppers offer impressive comfort from the moment you slip them on and a fit almost everyone loves. One concrete difference: the Pro’s tongue is gusseted and stays in place (even if it’s still fairly short); the Clifton 11’s is not.
The Pro also fixes the other criticism leveled at the Clifton 10 and 11: outsole durability. Its heel uses Super Abrasion Rubber for better durability and even better traction than the standard version.
Clifton 11 or Clifton Pro: Which Should You Choose?
For most runners, the Clifton Pro justifies the extra $10: it’s more responsive and more durable. It’s the Clifton to pick if you vary your paces in training.
To be completely honest, Hoka probably keeps the standard Clifton around only so it doesn’t disappoint the fans of this hugely popular series. But the 11 could very well have been the Pro, plain and simple.
The Clifton 11 can still be a good choice for you if you prefer a less firm feel on impact and you liked the Clifton 10.
