Adidas Adizero Adios Pro

Outsole

• The outsole of the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro uses smooth rubber that is sturdy with a shallow texture. This design ensures good traction on urban surfaces.

Midsole

• The midsole relies on Lightstrike Pro, which is the latest version of Lightstrike. According to the brand, it’s much bouncier and lighter than previously.
• Also, the carbon infused nylon plate under the heel provides a better stability to guide the athlete to run fast confortably and safely.
• Last but not least, EnergyRods are five carbon infused TPU rods that mold to the foot. This technology aims to make the ride snappier, especially at toe-off.

Upper

• The Adidas Adizero Adios Pro’s upper is Celermesh. It’s a lightweight thin and airy mesh especially created for high speeds. Unlike, Primeknit that is more flexible and equips sneaker-like shoes of Adidas, Celermesh gives a more fitted foot support without reducing comfort.

Frequently asked questions (FAQ)

Comparisons – Adidas Adizero Adios Pro vs:

Nike ZoomX Alphafly Next

According to runners who tested both shoes, the Alphafly is lighter, more stable (thanks to its wider heel), and more cushioned. In terms of energy return, they give a slight advantage to the Adios Pro, which offers a more complete and impressive springe due to the EnergyRods plates under the forefoot. Overall, it’s still mainly a matter of preference. Runners who make mostly heel strike may prefer the Alphafly.

Nike ZoomX Vaporfly Next

The Vaporfly Next% came out two years ago, and it shows how carbon plate technologies have developed since then. According to runners, the Vaporfly’s cushioning is much flatter and less bouncy than the Adios Pro’s, especially at toe-off. However, the Vaporfly has a wider and more stable platform, which could feel safer for runners who tend to heel strike.

Saucony Endorphin Pro

The Endorphin Pro offers, according to the testers, a more springy but also firmer cushioning, which may not be comfortable for everyone. So if you prefer soft cushioning, Adios Pro may be a better choice for long distances. The Endorphin Pro does have the advantage of being lighter, but that comes at a cost in terms of lockdown: runners who tested both shoes indicate that the Saucony’s upper provides less structure, resulting in a less secure lockdown.

Brooks Hyperion Elite 2

Both shoes offer similar cushioning, i.e., plushy soft for great comfort, even over long distances. However, the testers noted that the Adios Pro offers a much sharper energy return, resulting in more efficient, smoother transitions. The upper of the Adidas is better designed and offers a safer lockdown while maintaining great airflow. The only real advantage the Hyperion Elite 2 offers over the Adios Pro is its wider and more stable platform. Runners who find the rearfoot part of the Adidas model too narrow may find the wide profile of the Hyperion Elite 2 reassuring.