Comparing these two road shoes makes a lot of sense. They share the same goal: speed work like intervals, tempo runs and fartlek. On paper they’re very similar, and you might think it comes down to brand preference. But there are a few key differences to keep in mind.
First, the Endorphin Speed has more cushioning and a slightly softer feel, with a 36 mm stack versus 29 mm for the Mach. The Mach 6 also has a low drop (5 mm), while the Saucony uses a standard setup (8 mm).
The firm feel of the Hoka Mach can limit it to short and middle distances for runners who want more comfort. The Speed, by contrast, is also at home over the longest distances, marathon included, for the vast majority of runners.
The Endorphin Speed also has a nylon plate, which helps with propulsion. The Mach does very well with its responsive foam alone, though.
The next big difference is fit. Runners tend to find the Hoka Mach 6 a bit narrow, which can be uncomfortable if you have wide feet. It is available in a wide version, however.
The Saucony Endorphin Speed, on the other hand, is roomy by default, with a spacious (but not loose) midfoot and toe box.
Finally, the Hoka Mach is a bit lighter (not that you notice much on foot), and durability is similar on both: very decent.
Hoka Mach or Saucony Endorphin Speed: Which Should You Choose?
You can’t go wrong with either shoe. Both are daily trainers that let you run fast while staying comfortable. The bonus is that if you race and don’t plan on wearing a carbon-plated model, these two will do very well on race day.
Overall it comes down to personal preference (drop, cushioning) and foot shape and width. We recommend trying both models in a store and picking the more comfortable one.
