Asics Gel Nimbus 25 vs GT 2000 12 (2024 Comparison)
These two shoes are very popular in the Japanese brand’s collection. However, despite their similar design, they offer different configurations depending on the runner’s profile.
First of all, the Asics Gel Nimbus 25 is officially a neutral shoe, while the Asics GT 2000 12 is a stability shoe for overpronators. This distinction is further emphasized by the fact that the new Nimbus 25 no longer features a Trusstic unit to stabilize the runner’s movement when running.
As a result, the GT 2000 offers greater foot support, without matching the Kayano. The Nimbus offers stable running, but with special foot “guidance”.
It’s the cushioning that really sets the Nimbus apart. The Nimbus 25 is a max cushion running shoe with 41.5 mm heel stack height, compared with 36 mm for the GT 2000 12. In terms of bounce, the two shoes are equivalent, using the Japanese brand’s new foams. Their drop is 8 mm.
The GT 2000 12 is slightly more agile, with 1.1oz/30 g less weight than the Nimbus.
Lastly, athletes with wide feet will appreciate both models’ overall roomy fit.
Nimbus or GT 2000: Which One Should You Choose?
As you can see, the main difference between these two shoes is their level of support to prevent overpronation.
Runners looking for a moderate level of support will opt for the GT 2000 while those who don’t need much support but appreciate a stable ride will pick the Nimbus.
Side-By-Side Comparison
|
9  |
8.4  |
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Description | The Asics Gel Nimbus 25 marks a tectonic shift in the popular collection with more comfortable but less responsive max cushion. | Asics GT 2000 11 is a decent upgrade to the popular mid-level stability shoe series with notably better responsiveness. |
|
9.5
8
9.5
9
9
8
9
|
9
8
9
8
9
8.5
7.5
| |
| Facts | ||
| Terrain | Road | Road |
| Support | Neutral | Overpronation (stability) |
| Heel stack height | 41.5 mm | 23 mm |
| Forefoot stack height | 33.5 mm | 15 mm |
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Weight (men) | 299 g | 275 g |
| Weight (women) | 260 g | 235 g |
| Features | Heavy runner, Recycled materials | Recycled materials |
| Athletes | ||
| Release year | 2023 | 2023 |
| Technologies | ||
| Outsole | AHAR+ | AHARPLUS Rubber |
| Midsole | FlyteFoam Blast Eco, PureGEL, OrthoLite X-55 | FLYTEFOAM, FF BLAST, Rearfoot GEL, LITETRUSS, OrthoLite X-30 Sockliner |
| Upper | Technical Mesh | Jacquard Mesh |
| Cushioning | ||
| Cushioning | Soft | Balanced |
| Responsiveness | Medium | Medium |
| Use | ||
| Distance | Mid, 10K, Half marathon, Long, Marathon | Short, 5K, Mid, 10K, Half marathon |
| Speed | Slow, Moderate | Slow, Moderate |
| Workouts | Daily running, Recovery | Daily running |
