Brooks Glycerin 19 vs. Levitate 5 (2022)

These two Brooks shoes are available in neutral (for all types of pronation) and GTS (Go-To-Support for overpronation) versions.

The Glycerin is more cushioned under the heel with a 31 mm heel stack height versus 29 mm for the Levitate 5. However, the drop of the Glycerin is higher (10 mm) than the Levitate’s (8 mm), resulting in the same forefoot height.

In terms of underfoot feel, the Glycerin is rather soft while the Levitate is firmer. So it’s primarily a matter of preference.

Second, the Levitate has the advantage of featuring a new generation knit upper: StealthFit. It is comfortable and well fitted.

Finally, the Glycerin is lighter with 20 g/0.7 oz less, which is not negligible.

Glycerin or Levitate: which one to choose?

The Glycerin seems more versatile and better suited to faster paces. While neither shoe can boast a great responsive ride, the Levitate is, according to testers, sluggish, especially at lower speeds. This is due in part to its rigid platform and heavy build.

However, note that, for the same price (about $170), the Levitate is more durable than the Glycerin.

Not convinced by either of these shoes? Take a look at the Brooks Ghost 14.

Side-by-side comparison

Bottom Line

Pros

Cons

Brooks Glycerin 19

See full analysis

Check Prices

A good running shoe for daily training with efficient and fluid cushioning.

Good overall comfort
Effective and fluid cushioning
Perfect foot lockdown
The ide and breathable toe box

Cushioning that lacks responsiveness
Doubts about the durability of the outsole

Brooks Levitate 5

See full analysis

Check Prices

A shoe with a comfortable mesh upper and firm cushioning for fans of the brand.

Firm cushioning (for those who like it)
Shock absorption
Stable platform
Perfectly fitting upper
Decent bounce
Good quality
Elegant, almost lifestyle look

Firm cushioning (for those who don’t like it)
Too heavy
Rigid and uninspiring platform
A little expensive

Technical Specs

Technologies

Cushioning

Use