Asics Gel Kayano 32 Review (2025): Top Stability Pick?

Julien Guyod

Published on 06/04/2025

Apart from Nike’s Pegasus, it’s hard to find a series older than Kayano. This iconic high-end stability shoe, which has accompanied many runners, is now in its 32nd edition.

There have been many updates over the years, particularly with version 30, which saw a lot of changes. Does this new iteration get a makeover? Is it right for your runner profile and goals? We’ll find out in this comprehensive review.

Our Verdict

Cushioning

The midsole has been modified from the previous version with a new version of FlyteFoam Blast Plus foam, in a lighter formula. This is still combined with PUREGEL technology at the rear of the foot.

As you would expect from a stability shoe, the feel is quite firm on impact, more so than on the previous version in my opinion. This is a point raised by some testers, but as is often the case, it’s difficult to please everyone on this point.

However, we can still say that it’s a logical choice, as the Kayano’s target audience is looking for support rather than cushioning. It should also be noted that the PureGel at the rear will provide softness for heel strikers.

Another notable change is the dimensions of 40 mm heel stack height and 32 mm forefoot height (compared to 30 mm on the V31). Unsurprisingly, shock absorption is optimal and will allow all types of runners to confidently increase their training distance, provided they are willing to accept a certain amount of firmness.

The extra 2 mm at the front provides better protection for forefoot strikers, but this mainly results in a change in the heel-to-toe drop, which is now 8 mm instead of 10 mm.

This shouldn’t destabilize runners who are used to standard drops, but it’s still a first for a Kayano and may be something to consider for runners who have always run with a heel-to-toe drop of 10-12 mm.

Energy return

Weighing around 300 g/10.6 oz, the Asics Gel Kayano 32 is slightly lighter than the previous version (around 10g), despite the addition of foam. However, the shoe is still quite heavy and responsiveness is not its strong point.

That said, transitions are smooth with a noticeable rocker. The bounce will therefore be sufficient for most runners, as long as the shoe is used for moderate-paced runs.

Support and stability

On our website, we are generally wary of shoes labeled “pronation” or “supination” by manufacturers, simply because there is no consensus on this point at present. However, we can still judge the stability of a shoe.

The 4D GUIDANCE SYSTEM is based on four points:

• A wider base
• A secure fit
• Lateral grooves
• An energy bounce system in the midfoot: 4D guidance foam

This is more resistant and offers more bounce, which, according to the brand, adapts to all types of pronation (particularly pronation control).

I admit that I find it a little difficult to comment on the accuracy of this claim with my forefoot strike. However, I think that the shoe offers very good stability, with a less demanding profile than other shoes designed for this purpose.

Foot Lockdown

The engineered mesh upper is very similar to the previous version, which is not bad thing as it was a success. The generous padding is still there, ensuring excellent comfort.

This sock-like feel is very welcome and perfectly comparable to that of the queen of the category (the Nimbus). One of the few differences I noticed is that there are fewer perforations on the forefoot.

Despite this, breathability is once again satisfactory, which is quite an achievement given the thickness of the lining. The shoe also provides very good protection in cold weather.

With 4D technology, the fit is close to the foot, which is essential for a shoe designed to provide support for runners. Unsurprisingly (and as with previous versions), this is a comment that can be found in feedback from testers with wide or large feet.

However, the mesh is stretchy and flexible, the width at the forefoot is very standard in my opinion, and I think it’s fair to say that the shoe fits true to size.

The gusseted tongue is even better than on the V31. A pull tab has been added to make it easier to put on. The rigid heel counter is very effective and provides excellent support in this area.

The mesh heel tab alone could illustrate the high-end nature of the shoe, as it is so well crafted, proof that every detail has been refined.

Reflective elements ensure safety, and the Ortholite X-55 insole provides good moisture management. The upper is perfectly executed, as is the case with all Kayano shoes.

Traction

Asics has kept the same outsole as on the previous version, with technology that combines the qualities of their AHAR+ rubber with that of their trail running shoes to create HYBRID ASICSGRIP rubber.

For now, the brand is reserving this technology for its high-end models such as the Nimbus and Kayano, but I hope they will extend it to other series because I really like it.

The traction is very good and the fairly thin layer reduces the stiffness of the shoe. Even on wet surfaces, it’s clear that there’s very good grip. The numerous grooves ensure good flexibility for the sole.

No notable issues when using the shoe on most conventional trails, as long as they are not technical, since the Gel Kayano 32 is not designed for trail running.

Use Scenarios

The dimensions of the Asics Gel Kayano 32 leave little doubt as to the intended use of this shoe. It is designed to rack up the miles for daily training.

The shock absorption will allow all types of runners to confidently extend their distance to traditional long runs. However, be aware that the shoe feels quite firm, which may be a drawback if you prefer soft cushioning.

With its excellent stability, great comfort, and safe ride, this shoe is ideal for beginners, provided they are willing to pay the price.

There are no restrictions on user profiles. Unsurprisingly, the shoe is not ideal for accelerating pace, such as during speed sessions. More experienced runners will find the Kayano 32 more suitable for moderate-paced sessions.

For competition, there are obviously more high-performance models available, such as the new Metaspeed series, which will be released soon. However, this shoe is an excellent alternative to carbon plate shoes for marathon runners who don’t prioritize speed and prefer comfort and stability.

Quality and Durability

As with most shoes in the series, the shoe has a very good finish. The mesh is sturdy and the outsole has already proven itself. There is no particular reason why the denser foam should wear out early.

The lifespan seems as good as on other Kayano models, but if we find that this is not the case over time, we will update this section. The price is quite high, so we’ll leave it up to you to judge the value for money.

The dyeing process used to manufacture the insole reduces water consumption by around 33% and carbon emissions by around 45% compared to the conventional dyeing process. We should also add that the shoe is vegan.

Conclusion

The Asics Gel-Kayano 32 is not going to revolutionize the series and remains in line with previous versions (at least the most recent ones). It is suitable for both beginners and experienced runners for daily training.

There are, of course, more high-performance shoes for competition or simply for picking up the pace, but this shoe remains one of the best options for marathon runners looking for stability and comfort.

Facts

Technical Specs

Cushioning

Technologies

Use