9.5

Brooks Cascadia 16 Review Analysis (2021)

(2 user reviews)

$129.95

More cushioned without losing ground feel; the Brooks Cascadia 16 is a very good trail running shoe that offers comfort and protection for all conditions.

Add to compare
9.5Overall score
Very good trail running shoe with impressive comfort and protection for long runs
The Brooks Cascadia 16 is a comfortable and versatile running shoe to run on trails. This new version is lighter (finally under 300 g/10.6 oz) while offering more cushioning (29 mm under the heel).

The upper is softer and more spacious, which makes it more suitable for users with wide feet.

The new Brooks Cascadia 16 is more cushioned and softer at the same time. Also, its outsole offers more flexibility. The result is a smoother and more responsive run. Ah, and the legacy Pivot Post system is finally gone, without any negative impact on stability.

The grip is also top-notch. Even if some reviewers note that the profile of the lugs (medium depth) may not be suitable in some rare cases (really technical terrain, such as mud), not much to complain about here.

Finally, according to users, the value for money is good. These trail shoes feature a high-quality, sturdy build for optimal durability—no signs of wear after 50 miles/80 km—and comes with a reasonable price of $130 (expected retail price).

Please read our complete review analysis of the Brooks Cascadia 16 for more information.
Comfort
10
Grip
9
Protection
9.5
Durability
9.5
Value for money
9.5
Design
9
PROS
  • Great comfort
  • Very good grip for most situations
  • Softer, more flexible cushioning that continues to provide a good ground feel.
  • Durable shoe
  • Looser upper for wide feet, without diminishing the lockdown for others
CONS
  • Still a bit heavy, though finally under 300 g/10.6 oz.
  • Some reviewers say they could use more grip on very technical terrains

Brooks Cascadia 16 Complete Review Analysis

Brooks Cascadia on rocks

Introduction

The Brooks Cascadia is the flagship of the American brand’s trail collecting. Of course, it’s impossible to talk about the Cascadia without mentioning Scott Jurek: the legendary athlete has undoubtedly been a critical component of the shoe’s commercial success over the years. For those who do not know Scott Jurek, let’s just say he’s won the Western States 100 seven times (!)! Yup. And, by the way, if you’re looking for a great book on running (with delicious vegan recipes as a bonus), you should read Eat and Run when you have the chance.

However, despite this support, the Cascadia is not the most glamorous trail shoe out there. Also, it’s a model that has changed a lot over the years, with some versions better than others.

After a major overhaul in 2020 with version 15, Brooks is back again with another significant redesign in 2021. We’ll see that it’s for the better with some great reviews and tests from trailers who have extensively tested the shoe.

In a nutshell, here’s what you can expect: softer cushioning, more flexibility, and more toe box room!

Grip (outsole)

Brooks Cascadia 16 TrailTack rubber outsole with lugs
So let’s start with the outsole. It features the good old robust TrailTack rubber technology and its lugs to ensure optimal durability over the miles.

Trail runners didn’t notice any wear even after reaching 80 km/50 miles, which is an excellent sign. It’s undoubtedly one of the strongest suits of Brooks Running. We gently mocked the overall lack of style of their shoes earlier (not on the Cascadia 16, of course, which is quite sleek), but we must give credit where it’s due: it’s one of the best brands out there when it comes to quality and value for money!

Also, the outsole is more flexible, which gives better responsiveness overall. Of course, it makes it easier to find a good balance on tricky rocky terrains.

However, to achieve this, Brooks removed the lugs from under the midfoot. In the end, testers didn’t notice it much: there wasn’t a moment when they thought it was missing. So let’s see in the long term how opinions converge. Interestingly, Nike’s Terra Kiger 7 has gone the other way: it now includes lugs under the midfoot, which was not the case in previous versions.

The lugs are medium-sized and arrow-shaped. The grip is very good, and the Brooks Cascadia 16 should be suitable for most situations (e.g., dirt trails, wet surfaces). However, a few dissonant voices among users note that the shoe could do better on very technical courses (imagine slippery mud). So it’s up to you depending on your practice. If you think you’ll only be running on “classic” trails, then there’s no reason to go for a more edgy configuration.

Cushioning (midsole)

Trail runner wearing the Cascadia 16
After years of BioMoGO DNA, Brooks is shaking up its collection with new foams that rely on DNA LOFT technology. So, introducing DNA LOFT v2! We spare you the technical details (such as the so-called percentage improvement announced by the brand for the cushion) to focus on how the midsole felt for the testers.

According to them, the cushioning is softer and more flexible than before. It also comes from the extra stack: 29 mm heel height (21 mm under the toes), at least 3 mm more than on the Brooks Cascadia 15. In other words, we are getting closer and closer to the Caldera, the other flagship series in the Brooks trail series, historically more cushioned for long-distance cruising.

The heel-to-toe drop is still 8 mm, which is relatively standard, and a good middle ground for most people.

While the midsole cushioning is softer, testers still note a hint of firmness. Clearly, on a scale of one to ten, with one being very firm and ten very soft, we are on six. The arch support is sufficient to be comfortable during long runs, regardless of your arch type.

We also find the Ballistic Rock Shield: if some find it redundant and heavy, others appreciate the adequate foot protection this built-in rock plate offers.

Finally, note that this model finally gets rid of the infamous Pivot Post System usually reserved for support shoes. Don’t worry, though: testers report that the Brooks Cascadia 16 is stable!

Foot lockdown (upper)

Runner lacing the Brooks Cascadia 16, view of the mesh upper
Good news: the upper is roomier on this model to accommodate people with wider feet. Not that the Brooks Cascadia 15 was incredibly narrow, but it’s always better to get more space if you have wide feet, especially if you plan to run long distances. Besides, the looser, more generous fit does not interfere with the upper’s effective lockdown.

The toe box offers optimal protection and is flexible, which contributes to the shoe’s enhanced softness.

The upper uses tightly woven engineered mesh to keep water out. However, it’s also breathable enough. The Brooks Cascadia 16 is available in GTX for more optimal protection from the water, and there’s a velcro attachment point if you plan to use gaiters.

Overall, aside from the increased volume and the thicker heel collar, there are few changes. At the same time, it was not necessary considering the excellent lockdown already provided by the Cascadia 15.

Brooks Cascadia 16’s ride

According to the reviewers who tested the shoe, this new Brooks Cascadia offers the perfect combination of comfort, protection, and bounce.

The increased flexibility coupled with a softer, more generous cushion provides a smooth run on natural terrains.

The weight is not as light as we would expect—298 g (M)/269 g (W)—but runners couldn’t feel it. We still have to appreciate Brooks’ efforts to increase the cushioning and sole height while shaving a bit of the weight simultaneously (7 g less, yay!).

Last but not least, if the Brooks Cascadia 16 received such high scores from the testers, it’s also because of the excellent ground feel it offers. Typically, you have to choose between cushion and proprioception. Well, not here!

Conclusion

The Brooks Cascadia 16 ticks all the boxes: comfort, protection, cushioning, traction, and responsiveness. All testers gave it a very high rating, making the Cascadia a strong contender for the best trail running shoes 2021.

Model: Brooks Cascadia 16

Facts
Terrain

Trail

Heel to toe drop

8 mm

Heel stack height

29 mm

Forefoot stack height

21 mm

Pronation

Features

, , , ,

Weight (men)

298 g/10.5 oz

Weight (women)

269 g/9.5 oz

Fit

Release year

2021

Technologies
Midsole

Ballistic Rock Shield, DNA Loft v2

Outsole

TrailTack

Upper

Engineered Mesh

Cushioning
Bounce (1-5)

3 – Moderate

Softness (1-5)

4 – Soft

Use
Distance

Mid distance, Ultramarathon, Long distance

Speed

All

Workout

Daily running

Comparisons – Brooks Cascadia 16 vs.:

Brooks Cascadia 15

More cushioned, softer, roomier! All without sacrificing ground feel or foot lockdown. Therefore, the Brooks Cascadia 16 is more accessible and should suit more trail runners than in the past. Definitely an upgrade!

Brooks Caldera 5

See the side-by-side comparison with our analysis.

Hoka Speedgoat 4

See the side-by-side comparison with our analysis.

FAQs

How does the Brooks Cascadia 16 fit?

Answer: This shoe follows a standard sizing system. Testers confirm that it fits true to size. So you can choose your usual size.

Is the Cascadia available in Gore-Tex?

Answer: Yes, there are two versions available: standard and GTX.

Is the Cascadia 16 good for hiking?

Answer: It's not its main function, but yes, it's possible. In terms of traction, it's on par with hiking boots. However, it has the low-cut design can limit ankle support, especially if you are carrying a heavy backpack.

2 reviews for Brooks Cascadia 16

3.0 out of 5
1
0
0
0
1
Write a review
Show all Most Helpful Highest Rating Lowest Rating
  1. Runner’s Lab

    Very good trail running shoe with impressive comfort and protection for long runs.

    Helpful(1) Unhelpful(0)You have already voted this
  2. Speedy Gonzales

    Cascadia models 14-16 are crap compared to the models Cascadia 13 and earlier. The new models have a terrible trail grip, you can feel every little stone because they removed the harder soles, they are now wider for some stupid reason, they are like running in flip flops. For years I bought these shoes and loved them, threw the new model in the trash because they are the worst shoes I have ever purchased.

    + PROS: None
    - CONS: Waste of money and a horrible trail shoe. Of the 50+ Brooks running shoes I have purchased these new Cascadia's are the worst shoe of them all. I am changing brands.
    Helpful(1) Unhelpful(10)You have already voted this

    Add a review

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

    Brooks Cascadia 16
    Brooks Cascadia 16 Review Analysis (2021)
    Runner's Lab
    Logo
    Compare items
    • Total (0)
    Compare