2020 was a special year for Saucony—besides the worldwide circumstances we all know, obviously—with the great success of its Endorphin range. Far from being eclipsed, the Saucony Ride has consolidated its status as the ultimate daily trainer with practical and classic cushioning. Version 14 continues this trend with few changes.

The Saucony Ride 14 is a comfortable and versatile shoe with a high stack cushioning: 32 mm under the forefoot and 24 mm under the forefoot. However, the platform is quite firm, according to the testers. Thus, shock absorption is good, but the ride is somewhat rigid. In terms of cushioning, as on the previous model, some runners noted a slight bounce, while others found the ride a bit dull. Let's note that the R14 still uses PWRRUN foam instead of the newer PWRRUN PB, which has the reputation of packing a punch in the energy return department. In other words, what was suitable in 2020 seems a bit dated in 2021.

The upper is very comfortable and offers an ideal lockdown with the right amount of flexibility and support. Also, the upper is much more breathable than before, thanks to a more open mesh design. Not only it allows air to circulate better, but it also makes the upper more flexible. The only slightly negative point is the tongue, which some testers deemed too thick.

Finally, the outsole does not skimp on rubber to ensure effective traction and make the shoe more robust. The other advantage of this configuration is that the shoe is quieter—pedestrians will no longer turn around when they hear you coming (beware: this stealth mode can scare people at night!).

In summary, the Saucony Ride 14 remains an excellent choice for daily training, thanks to its comfort and versatility. The firm cushioning may not be to everyone's liking, but overall it's effective. We only hope that the next iteration will benefit from a more responsive foam!

Don't have time to read the complete review analysis? Here's what you need to know.

The Mizuno collection gets an upgrade with the new Enerzy foam. The Mizuno Wave Rider 25 especially benefits from this evolution with a more modern and lighter design.

While some Rider models suffered from a lack of responsiveness, testers note that this shoe offers a slight bounce and a smooth run. The feel is still classic but very pleasant. Testers also report that the cushioning is softer than ever before.

The upper is thinner and more breathable while providing a snug foot lockdown without floating. Besides, the materials used are more environmentally friendly than in the past.

In terms of durability, while the Wave Rider 24 was disappointing, runners remark that the outsole of the Wave Rider 25 is very sturdy and does not get damaged easily, even after multiple long runs. Also, despite the generous amount of rubber to achieve this result, the platform remains flexible and pleasant underfoot with the use of deep flex grooves (Flex Controllers)

The only weak point of the Wave Rider, according to runners, is the thinness of the sole under the forefoot (20 mm) and the high drop of 12 mm. It's a characteristic that has not changed since the beginning of the series and seems somewhat outdated in 2021.

All in all, the Mizuno Wave Rider 25 is a very good running shoe with a classic design for a comfortable and smooth ride. It's for you if you're looking for reliable running shoes suitable for daily workouts and long runs.

Read the complete Mizuno Wave Rider 25 review analysis below for more information.

Salomon is a major player in trail running shoes. While the S/Lab Sense Pro held the top spot for a long time, there's a new little gem of technology to be reckoned with: the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar! This lightweight and seek competition trail shoe was designed in Annecy (France) at Salomon HQ for its top athletes like Kilian Jornet. So let's see if what's good for the elite is suitable for regular runners like you and me!

The first thing that stands out from all the reviews is that this shoe is incredibly lightweight: only 174 g/6.1 oz (men's model). Its sole is more flexible and slightly thicker than that of the S/Lab Sense 8. It uses a new foam: Energy Surge. We get a 14.5 mm stack height under the heel and 20.5 mm under the forefoot foot for a drop of 6 mm. Runners who have tried the shoe note that the cushioning is relatively firm while being comfortable. The sensations are excellent with a springy ride due to the foam, the low drop, and the nice ground feel. It also appears from the various tests that the rebound is excellent, which makes the shoe ideal for competition. However, the low stack height may limit the shoe's potential for long distances such as ultramarathon running, although it's a matter of personal preference. Also, let's note that several testers expressed concern about the durability of the midsole. It's a point to watch. It may be wise to use it primarily in competition and opt for a more robust model for daily training.

Regarding the upper, wide-footed runners found the Pulsar quite tricky to put on, as the collar is very narrow. As with all of Salomon's S/Lab models, QuickLace replaces the traditional laces. On this model, the eyelets have disappeared, and the lace goes directly into the fabric. We find a small pocket on the top to slip the excess laces, but some of the testers complained about the small size of this pocket. Trailers particularly appreciated the "mini-sock," which prevents the presence of dirt and gravel in the shoe. Overall, they noted an excellent lockdown, despite the lack of structure of the upper.

On the outer part of the sole is Contagrip, a blown rubber that equips most of the brand's trail running shoes. The design of the lugs and their depth suggest that this shoe will be more suitable for not too technical and not too wet terrain. This point is confirmed by several testers who noted a limited grip in the mud.

In summary, the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar an outstanding elite trail shoe to go fast on the trails. Though it was developed for and endorsed by superstar Kilian Jornet, all the testers had a lot of fun running with the Pulsar and felt they, too, could push their limits!

With its fun and unique pops of color, optimal padding, and modern design, the Saucony Endorphin Shift is the third model in the Endorphin line. Of the three, It's the 'every day/recovery' shoe, a workhorse to comfortably run for long distances. With a stack height 38 mm under the heel and 34 mm under the forefoot, the Shift features a thoroughly-padded midsole designed with PWWRUN foam. Runners described it as 'bouncy' and 'rolling through every stride', which is a clear plus for running longer distances. The upper shoe is described as "stellar" and comparable to the other two Endorphin shoes. It's also highly-praised for its inviting and vibrant aesthetic. Finally, the outsole is particularly notable for its rubber grip that provides decent traction on roads. With its rubber grip, the shoe does perform well on off-road terrains as well, such as sand, gravel... However, one runner noted that the shoe began to slip a bit on wet terrain but consistently does well on a variety of dry landscapes. Also, while the Shift received many good reviews from satisfied runners, a few noted that the toe box of the shoe proved to be a bit too narrow/restrictive to fit a variety of feet. Additionally, some runners remarked that the shoe ran on the heavier side, which took away from its 'bouncy' engineering. Indeed, with 292 g/10.3 oz for men and 264 g/9.3 oz for women, the Shift is much heavier than its racing counterpart, the Endorphin Pro, and its 221 g/7.8 oz. This difference can be explained by the price but also by the vocation of each shoe. Saucony wants us to buy the three models of the collection and alternate according to our training and races. ln this regard, the Endorphin Shift is an interesting trainer option to run comfortably for a long time. To summarize, the Saucony Endorphin Shift is a very good low drop 'everyday trainer' that's especially great for recovery runs with its comfortable and generous cushioning.

The Altra Olympus 4 is a trail shoe with a high-stack sole (33 mm), zero drop (so no offset between heel and toes), and a wide platform. This new version is more refined, however, which gives the shoe a more streamlined and less massive design. However, it retains the qualities that have made it so successful. Its high-stack cushioning ensures comfortable shock absorption throughout the run. Also, the running sensations are responsive with an enjoyable bounce. Of course, with its relatively heavy weight (318 g for men, 289 g for women), this is not a model made for speed and daring descents. The Olympus is a trail running cruiser that's all about comfort. It shows in the upper with a mesh that now has an open texture for better ventilation. The result is a pleasant and rather ample lockdown (be careful if you have narrow feet). The toe box is spacious as on all Altra models. Finally, the grip is very good with a Vibram MegaGrip rubber sole that features moderate lugs. The configuration is sturdy and can take a beating according to trailers who tested the shoe. Thus, the Olympus 4 is a comfortable option for medium difficulty trails (its ample foot lockdown and not-so-aggressive lugs don't make it the best choice for the most technical surfaces). A very good shoe for trailers looking for maximum comfort for their long trail runs.

The Peregrine reigns over Saucony's trail range alongside the Xodus. It's a peppy shoe with fantastic versatility that continues to impress despite its persistent bulky weight.

The outsole and its lugs are almost identical to those of the P10—and still just as effective! They offer impeccable grip on the most technical surfaces. It's even possible to add ice screws if needed. Besides, there's the ST (Soft Terrain) version for soft surfaces such as mud. It comes with 6.5 mm lugs compared to 5 mm for the standard and GTX versions.

The stack height is higher than before, with 27 mm under the heel and 23 mm under the forefoot. The foam used is still PWRRUN with a similar medium density, slightly firm, cushioning. The midsole absorbs shocks well while still allowing some ground feel. This configuration is beneficial on technical terrain as it provides good stability while ensuring a smooth run.

Finally, like the rest of the shoe, the upper shows no radical change but rather small touches here and there, such as a thicker tongue and a better overlay system. It gives a secure lockdown and adequate ventilation with plenty of toe room—the forefoot part is not as roomy as an Altra, but it will fit most runners.

In summary, the Saucony Peregrine 11 continues to dominate the trail category with a powerful configuration for a wide range of terrains and situations thanks to its outstanding foot lockdown, protection, and grip. The slightly firm cushioning may not appeal to you if you like plush padding, but it's a matter of preference. This model's real weak point (as with its predecessors) is its weight, with 10.9 oz/310 g for men and 9.5 oz/270 g for women. Let's hope Saucony can hear us on that one!

The latest model in Hoka's Mafate Speed line-up is now available, and the vibrantly-colored 3 does not disappoint. With an improved upper and only slightly heavier design, we're about to weigh the pros and cons of this trainer—pun intended!

For starters, let's talk about the CMEVA midsole of the Speed 3. Nearly-identical to its predecessors (the EVO Mafate and Mafate Speed 2), it's built for cushioning your foot at high speeds with its blend of softness and snap. Even with a bit of added weight, the 3 is fast, though taller lugs may require some adjustment. Thanks to a roomy yet supportive mesh upper, feet remain secure while allowing for a bit of stretch. Compared with previous versions, runners referenced the new upper as the most significant improvement to the 3. Finally, the outsole—with sturdy, 5 mm lugs—are built for traction yet fell flat for some runners on slippery surfaces. These same lugs proved a bit too bulky for other users, especially on rocky or gravel surfaces. Testers reported the best performance once the lugs had been a bit worn-in.

A few complaints about the Speed 3 included lug height (as it threw off stability), and subsequently, added weight. Users clarified that this extra weight was unnoticeable while running downhill and that overall, the 3 offers a fast, smooth ride. Also, at 10.7 oz/303 g (M) for a heel stack height of 33 mm, the cushioning-weight ratio is not bad at all! Once the shoe is broken in, and the lugs are worn a bit down, this model is great for long-distance runners. Slippery and very technical surfaces pose some traction problems, but the MS3 performs very well in most trail scenarios.

Ultimately, the Mafate Speed 3 is a very good option for those with wider feet seeking a secure yet forgiving ride. Price-wise, this model falls on the higher end of the scale, but the combination of comfort and responsiveness is worthwhile!

Don't have time to read the full review? Here's what you need to know.

Don't have time to read the full review? Here's what you need to know.

The main change from the Triumph 18 is a significant weight drop, with a new lightweight and breathable mono mesh upper. By finally going under the 300 g/10.6 oz mark (290g for the men's version), Saucony has finally corrected the main downside of the previous models according to runners while keeping an excellent foot lockdown.

The midsole still features Saucony's flagship cushioning technology: PWRRUN+. The ride feels excellent: athletes love the softness and responsiveness of the cushioning.

The outsole is very resistant with a good amount of XT-900 rubber while remaining flexible and allows for miles of running without early wear on the platform. The grip is also perfect on dry and wet pavements alike.

Runners love the shoe's new aesthetic, which is stylish and has some fun touches (yellow laces, mind you!). They also appreciate the brand's efforts to use more environmentally friendly materials.

In summary, 2021 is a very good vintage for the Saucony Triumph, with a new version rich in improvements. We see little reason to pass upon it, especially if you're looking for a comfortable premium shoe for your long runs.

Please read our complete review analysis of the Saucony Triumph 19 for more information.

Don't have time to read the complete review analysis? Here's what you need to know.

The Pegasus Trail 3 is Nike's max cushioned trail running shoe with a 31 mm heel stack height featuring Nike React foam. The ride feels good at any pace with a slight bounce.

The main improvement on this new version is the new upper that offers a more precise foot lockdown for more stability. In addition, the design is top-notch, like the Terra Kiger or the Wildhorse.

The main downside of this trail running shoe, as with its predecessors, is its grip: traction is not optimal on tricky terrain like mud. However, it does allow you to venture out onto the asphalt, making it a good door-to-trail option if you want to run on both surfaces.

In summary, the Nike Pegasus Trail 3 is a very good comfortable, and versatile trail running shoe that's fun for most terrains but can fall short on technical ones.

Read the complete Nike Pegasus Trail 3 review analysis below for more information.

Nike's star trainer is back: the Air Zoom Pegasus 38! The previous model marked a significant overhaul in the series (with notably the introduction of React foam). The Pegasus 38 carries on down this path with only a few changes to report. This new model keeps what worked on the 37 and course corrects the few things that disappointed runners.

Let's start with the elements that don't change much: the midsole, with its React foam and Air Zoom unit, continues to offer comfortable and smooth cushioning. Nothing spectacular in terms of responsiveness—this is a point that inevitably comes up every year. At the same time, it's not in the DNA of the Pegasus. For a bouncier trainer in the Nike range, we recommend the Nike ZoomX Invincible Run. The stack height is still 28 mm thick under the heel and 18 mm under the forefoot (the drop is 10 mm). So it's a good option for athletes who like good cushioning while staying clear of maximalism. In terms of underfoot feel, male testers note that the sole is a little softer than before, while female testers report a bit more firmness (the configuration is slightly different between men and women). Overall, the cushioning is of moderate density.

The rubber outsole gives a good grip and seems sturdy. The main change here is the use of Nike Grind (post-industrial recycled materials) up to 9%. Nothing to shout from the rooftops, but it's a start! One important point flagged by a couple of reviewers: it seems that there are some early signs of sole wear ("creasing" to be exact), so that's something to keep an eye on.

Let's move on to the upper, which concentrates most of the changes. The forefoot is higher and wider, which will delight people who need volume. Some testers complained of some heel slippage with the P37, and Nike adjusted this part for a more secure lockdown. On the other hand, the midfoot webbing allows the upper to hug the foot more evenly when pulling on the laces. Finally, the tongue is longer and more padded. The Pegasus has always offered an impeccable lockdown, and this 38 version is no exception.

The Consensus

In summary, the Pegasus is unsurprisingly... a Pegasus: comfortable, durable, well-fitting, and affordable! While the ride won't knock your socks off, it's a reliable shoe that has the merit of being suitable for everyone (or almost)—a star trainer for everyday use that continues to win the popular vote.

We all know Nike for the brand's ability to craft a fantastic running shoe, and it's certainly proven itself through the years. However, the Nike Metcon 6—successor to the acclaimed Metcon 5—is a shoe of a different color (and style). Described as the ultimate "gym shoe," the Metcon 6 will perform as well as you do, from box jumps to squats. However you train, this model is designed to support you every step of the way.

We'll start by examining the midsole of the Metcon 6. Dual-density cushioning ensures shock absorption with each jump and kick, from the heel all the way to the forefoot. The heel is designed with firmer foam, while the foam used for the forefoot is a bit more cushiony. The two types of padding lend themselves to activities such as squats and deadlifts and jumps and sprints. For added versatility, one surprising feature of the midsole is that it features a removable Hyperlift insert. This makes it possible to adjust the drop (from 4 to 12 mm) to tailor your workout experience to whatever feels best for your feet. Also noteworthy is the Metcon 6's highly breathable upper, which sets it apart from the 5. Crafted with dual-layer material and 3D haptic print for durability, Nike claims that it's 18% more breathable than previous models. Finally, the shoe's all-rubber outsole is virtually unchanged, maintaining the same great grip as the Metcon 5.

There's a lot to like about the Metcon 6, but one of its main advantages—versatility—may also be a drawback: while the Hyperlift inserts may help turn the Metcon into a proper pair of lifters, some athletes noted that it's not enough to replace a classic like the Nike Romaleos. Also, while it may be possible to take the Metcon 6 for a run, they are not intended for this use, so it may cause them to wear out early.

Overall, the Metcon 6 is a very good shoe for the gym and can perform well across a range of activities. From CrossFit to sprints and jump rope to the rock wall, it honestly doesn't get much better than this. With a price of $130—standard for most shoes of its caliber—it's a solid option for regular gym rats looking for near-perfect, versatile design and unique style.

The Saucony Kinvara is back with a much-anticipated new model—photos of its new look had leaked over the summer, sparking much speculation about its new configuration. Its new, lighter design with bright, flashy colors gives it a modern yet retro 90s charm. But is this enough to rival Saucony's new Endorphin series that received wide acclaim in 2020?

First of all, the Saucony Kinvara 12 remains true to itself and focuses on the strengths that have made the range so successful: a simple, light, and well-cushioned configuration. With only 219 grams on the scale, the Kinvara has never been so light! It even rivals the latest carbon-fiber plate racers. However, as we will see, it's a shoe with a "traditional" profile geared for daily training.

The upper is the big strength of the new model. The engineered mesh with a few discreet overlays offers a perfect lockdown and is easy to forget. Testers use three words to describe it: simple, effective, and soft. There's not a single thing amiss. Even the laces and tongue were a hit with everyone. Also, the upper is roomy enough for athletes with wider feet.

The midsole exhibits the same simplicity but is a bit disappointing. Here, simplicity rhymes with dullness according to several runners: the ride is good but not very exciting. Others are more indulgent and instead note a flexible platform with a good ground natural feeling while providing the cushioning needed to absorb shocks. However, if there's one point on which reviews agree, it's the firmness of the sole. So be warned: despite the more than generous stack height (28 mm under the heel), the K12 is firmer than its predecessors.

Finally, the outsole is very similar to that of the K11, with mainly exposed foam and a few strategically positioned rubber pieces to protect the shoe from wear and tear. The configuration is effective: it provides a good grip, even in wet conditions, and is durable for the kind of mileage you would expect from a trainer.

In summary, the Saucony Kinvara 12 is a very decent running shoe despite some issues. On the one hand, it has a very light build (especially for the stack height) and an outstanding upper, but on the other hand, the cushioning has nothing special. If anything, it's rather firm, especially for long workouts. We recommend it for runners who are after a stable well-structured cushioning that delivers a comfortable, yet firm ground feel.