The Best Trail Running Shoes
Read our guide to pick the best trail running shoes for you.
Filter results
Showing 1–12 of 31 results
The Hoka One One Torrent 2 is an excellent trail running shoe that is both lightweight and effective for going fast and far on the toughest terrains. One of the best shoes of 2020!
★★★★★
More details + $119.95
What happens when you take an already very good shoe that won the accolades of the trail community in 2018 and make it a little better? You get an exceptional model that's close to perfection. Nothing less! Indeed, the Hoka Torrent 2 confirms its reputation as an ultra-versatile, comfortable and lightweight shoe. While the first model had been very well received, some criticized its upper as being too harsh and not safe enough to tackle very technical surfaces, especially downhill. This second version addresses this feedback with an improved upper that translates into a more classic mesh. Paradoxically, it is more flexible while offering a more precise foot lockdown. According to the testers, the result feels very secure without being too tight (the shoe is also suitable for trailers with wider feet). Then, regarding the cushioning, we find the PROFLY double density foam which gives comfortable but fairly firm padding. The absence of a protective plate combined with the moderate cushioning provides excellent ground feeling. This will appeal to athletes who like a good natural ride on the trails. Overall, the Torrent 2 offers a good compromise between shock absorption, protection and ground feel. Thus, trailers who tested the shoe found it very comfortable, even after several hours of running, despite the relative thinness of the sole. Finally, the traction is always impeccable whatever the terrain or the type of elevation. The multidirectional studs are indeed more numerous and slightly more aggressive, which makes it easy to tackle the most technical trails, whether soft mud or slippery rocks. In short, the Hoka Torrent 2 is an excellent trail shoe (maybe even the best of the year!) that proves to be effective and comfortable in all circumstances. A reference shoe not to be missed!
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Very grippy
- Improved upper that provides a soft and secure fit
- Lightweight trail shoe
- A model that will appeal to runners interested in Hoka but who prefer a moderately thick sole
- Effective cushioning despite the moderate stack height
CONS:
- Long and inconvenient laces
- Upper a little warm for the summer
The Hoka One One Speedgoat 4 is an excellent comfortable trail running shoe destined for the most technical terrains.
★★★★★
More details + $144.95
The Hoka One One Speedgoat 4 is a trail shoe inspired by the legendary ultramarathon athlete Karl 'Speedgoat' Meltzer. With an excellent third model, we were looking forward to this fourth iteration. On the one hand, it is sometimes disappointing to find a new model with few improvements, but on the other hand, it is reassuring to see an excellent shoe keep its substance and not change radically. As the saying goes, you don't change a winning team! Thus, the Speedgoat 4 is very similar to the SG3 with some notable improvements. Cushioning is still as comfortable and responsive despite the introduction of a new injection-molded EVA foam. The Speedgoat is a maximalist shoe with 32 mm of thickness under the heel and thus effectively absorbs shocks on the most challenging terrains. However, it is not soft and offers an excellent return of energy for a bounce-filled racing feeling. It's one of the main assets that make it an exceptional trail shoe.
Also, the SG4 is a low drop shoe with a 4 mm offset between heel and toes. The upper is the part that features the most changes. Indeed, reputed to be too narrow in the past for many athletes, it is now wider at the toe level and no longer compresses them uncomfortably. So the shoe should now be suitable for as many people as possible. Make no mistake though: the upper remains relatively firm with limited flexibility, but this configuration has the advantage of providing an effective foot lockdown. It makes you feel safer on very rough technical terrain where stability and secure fit are essential. Also, the mesh is robust and breathable. Finally, the grip is always at its best with a Vibram outsole with 5mm lugs that provide excellent traction in all conditions. In short, the Hoka One One Speedgoat 4 is an excellent trail shoe ideal for long distances on the most technically challenging trails.
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Excellent grip
- Maximum cushioning and responsive at the same time
- New upper with a broader toe area
- Robust, durable design
- Versatile: even though the SG4 excels above all on rugged terrain, it will also be suitable for small dirt roads with no particular technical skills.
CONS:
- Slightly heavier than the previous model
More cushioned without losing ground feel; the Brooks Cascadia 16 is a very good trail running shoe that offers comfort and protection for all conditions.
★★★★★
More details + $129.95
The Brooks Cascadia 16 is a comfortable and versatile running shoe to run on trails. This new version is lighter (finally under 300 g/10.6 oz) while offering more cushioning (29 mm under the heel).
The upper is softer and more spacious, which makes it more suitable for users with wide feet.
The new Brooks Cascadia 16 is more cushioned and softer at the same time. Also, its outsole offers more flexibility. The result is a smoother and more responsive run. Ah, and the legacy Pivot Post system is finally gone, without any negative impact on stability.
The grip is also top-notch. Even if some reviewers note that the profile of the lugs (medium depth) may not be suitable in some rare cases (really technical terrain, such as mud), not much to complain about here.
Finally, according to users, the value for money is good. These trail shoes feature a high-quality, sturdy build for optimal durability—no signs of wear after 50 miles/80 km—and comes with a reasonable price of $130 (expected retail price).
Please read our complete review analysis of the Brooks Cascadia 16 for more information.
The upper is softer and more spacious, which makes it more suitable for users with wide feet.
The new Brooks Cascadia 16 is more cushioned and softer at the same time. Also, its outsole offers more flexibility. The result is a smoother and more responsive run. Ah, and the legacy Pivot Post system is finally gone, without any negative impact on stability.
The grip is also top-notch. Even if some reviewers note that the profile of the lugs (medium depth) may not be suitable in some rare cases (really technical terrain, such as mud), not much to complain about here.
Finally, according to users, the value for money is good. These trail shoes feature a high-quality, sturdy build for optimal durability—no signs of wear after 50 miles/80 km—and comes with a reasonable price of $130 (expected retail price).
Please read our complete review analysis of the Brooks Cascadia 16 for more information.
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Very good grip for most situations
- Softer, more flexible cushioning that continues to provide a good ground feel.
- Durable shoe
- Looser upper for wide feet, without diminishing the lockdown for others
CONS:
- Still a bit heavy, though finally under 300 g/10.6 oz.
- Some reviewers say they could use more grip on very technical terrains
The Salomon Sense Ride 4 is an all-round trail running shoe that combines comfort, protection, and grip.
★★★★★
More details + $119.95
The Salomon Sense Ride 4 is a popular trail running shoe reputed for its comfort and efficiency. This new version features a lighter configuration with a new upper.
The Sense Ride has shined since its debut with comfortable cushioning that disperses shocks on various trail running surfaces. The ride is enjoyable over longer distances. According to testers, version 3 was less springy and more protective, and it looks like 4 continues that trend. It's possible to go fast, but let's say that it may not be as compelling as other lighter shoes in this area.
The new, more straightforward, sleeker (and lighter) upper still provides a precise foot lockdown with decent midfoot and forefoot space. The combination of Sensifit (overlays) and Endofit (internal bootie) ticks all the boxes. Finally, Quicklace has been a core feature of Salomon for years and still does a great job at allowing a worry-free adjustment of the laces.
The grip is as impeccable as the rest. The Contagrip rubber outsole and its medium-depth lugs excel on all different types of surfaces. Trail runners have found no shortcomings in this area: whether you're running on soft dirt, rocks, or snow, the SR4 performs!
As you can see, the Salomon Sense Ride 4 sets the bar high by combining comfort, protection, and grip—all this while shedding significant weight. The only slightly negative point is the firm ride, but that's a matter of preference and doesn't affect the excellent shock absorption.
The Sense Ride has shined since its debut with comfortable cushioning that disperses shocks on various trail running surfaces. The ride is enjoyable over longer distances. According to testers, version 3 was less springy and more protective, and it looks like 4 continues that trend. It's possible to go fast, but let's say that it may not be as compelling as other lighter shoes in this area.
The new, more straightforward, sleeker (and lighter) upper still provides a precise foot lockdown with decent midfoot and forefoot space. The combination of Sensifit (overlays) and Endofit (internal bootie) ticks all the boxes. Finally, Quicklace has been a core feature of Salomon for years and still does a great job at allowing a worry-free adjustment of the laces.
The grip is as impeccable as the rest. The Contagrip rubber outsole and its medium-depth lugs excel on all different types of surfaces. Trail runners have found no shortcomings in this area: whether you're running on soft dirt, rocks, or snow, the SR4 performs!
As you can see, the Salomon Sense Ride 4 sets the bar high by combining comfort, protection, and grip—all this while shedding significant weight. The only slightly negative point is the firm ride, but that's a matter of preference and doesn't affect the excellent shock absorption.
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Cushioning that disperses shocks well
- The effective grip on most terrains
- Good foot protection
- New lighter upper
CONS:
- Cushioning can be a little firm for some trail runners and lacks responsiveness
The Saucony Xodus 11 are very good trail running shoes combining comfort, cushioning, and versatility for long runs.
★★★★★
More details + $149.95
Don't have time to read the complete review analysis? Here's what you need to know.
There is no major evolution compared to the previous version; only the upper improved for more durability and a better fit.
This new version remains a bit heavy (still above 300g), although runners note that the weight does not affect the run's responsiveness.
The upper is roomy and ensures comfort for runners with wide feet.
There's a lot of stability in this model with its subtle combination of enhanced PWRRUN+ cushioning (31.5 mm heel stack height), PWRTRAC outsole, and 4 mm low drop.
The grip is one of the shoe's strengths, with aggressive multi-directional lugs that adapt to all types of terrain, even the steepest. A few trail runners have expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the outsole on really muddy terrain, however.
Finally, this shoe features high-quality materials to be durable. It's a very good trail model suitable for ultramarathon running.
Read the complete Saucony Xodus 11 review analysis for more information.
There is no major evolution compared to the previous version; only the upper improved for more durability and a better fit.
This new version remains a bit heavy (still above 300g), although runners note that the weight does not affect the run's responsiveness.
The upper is roomy and ensures comfort for runners with wide feet.
There's a lot of stability in this model with its subtle combination of enhanced PWRRUN+ cushioning (31.5 mm heel stack height), PWRTRAC outsole, and 4 mm low drop.
The grip is one of the shoe's strengths, with aggressive multi-directional lugs that adapt to all types of terrain, even the steepest. A few trail runners have expressed doubts about the effectiveness of the outsole on really muddy terrain, however.
Finally, this shoe features high-quality materials to be durable. It's a very good trail model suitable for ultramarathon running.
Read the complete Saucony Xodus 11 review analysis for more information.
PROS:
- Versatile trail running shoes that adapts to all terrains
- Soft but responsive cushioning
- Effective grip
- More durable and better fitting upper
- Good protection against rocks
CONS:
- Still a bit heavy; it hasn't dropped below 300 g/10.6 oz yet
The Hoka Zinal is a lightweight trail shoe that combines comfort, protection, and responsiveness for your fast sessions.
★★★★★
More details + $159.95
The Zinal is the brand new trail running shoe from Hoka One One. It excels on short and medium distances and moderately technical terrains, such as the famous Sierre-Zinal race.
This lightweight shoe (less than 250 g) uses Vibram Megagrip Litebase rubber on the inside for grip and ProFly cushioning on the inside for cushioning. The 4-mm lugs of the Zinal provide good grip on most surfaces, except perhaps muddy and slippery ground. The mesh upper features recycled materials and a gusseted tongue. The heel-to-toe drop of the shoe is 4 mm. Testers note that the lockdown is effective while leaving enough room around the toes not to feel too tight.
The Hoka One One Zinal is a shoe that offers good stability. The low profile allows for a good ground feel and optimal energy return but is comfortable enough to protect the foot. As such, the Zinal is especially suitable for speed workouts on easy to medium difficulty trails. It's ideal for short to medium distances (30km to 50km), but experienced athletes can also leverage it occasionally for ultramarathon running.
This lightweight shoe (less than 250 g) uses Vibram Megagrip Litebase rubber on the inside for grip and ProFly cushioning on the inside for cushioning. The 4-mm lugs of the Zinal provide good grip on most surfaces, except perhaps muddy and slippery ground. The mesh upper features recycled materials and a gusseted tongue. The heel-to-toe drop of the shoe is 4 mm. Testers note that the lockdown is effective while leaving enough room around the toes not to feel too tight.
The Hoka One One Zinal is a shoe that offers good stability. The low profile allows for a good ground feel and optimal energy return but is comfortable enough to protect the foot. As such, the Zinal is especially suitable for speed workouts on easy to medium difficulty trails. It's ideal for short to medium distances (30km to 50km), but experienced athletes can also leverage it occasionally for ultramarathon running.
PROS:
- Light and fast shoe
- Great comfort
- Effective cushioning
- Good foot protection
- Good balance between weight, responsiveness, stability, and versatility
CONS:
- Some concerns about the sturdiness of the upper
- Not suitable for very technical terrains (e.g. snow, mud)
- Not the best option for ultramarathon races
The Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 is a very good trail running with effective grip to run long distances comfortably.
★★★★★
More details + $179.95
The Salomon shoe specially designed for ultra trail running is back. The S/Lab Ultra 3 is a versatile shoe favored by French star François d'Haene, a three-time UTMB winner. So what is this new version worth? First of all, the configuration remains almost identical in terms of weight and stack height. The grip is still excellent with the Contagrip rubber and its moderately aggressive lugs. The Ultra 3 is comfortable on most terrains, although testers note that deeper lugs would be welcome on steep and muddy routes. Also, as with previous versions, the configuration is robust and wear-resistant. In terms of cushioning, the stack height is moderate, with 26 mm under the heel and 18 mm under the forefoot. Trailers characterize the cushioning as "fairly firm" while offering good flexibility and shock absorption, which makes the ride enjoyable even over long distances. They also describe the feel of the run as springy, with smooth transitions throughout the run, even at low speeds. Then, the upper is softer with a streamlined, seamless design that gets rid of the "wings" of the previous model. The foot lockdown is great, resulting in a stable and safe run. Also, the upper is slightly more spacious (especially in the toe area), and its flexibility ensures good freedom of movement for the foot. The only negative point of the upper would be its lack of ventilation. Besides, despite all its great qualities, the shoe is on the expensive side with a base price of $180. In summary, the Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 is a very good trail shoe that is comfortable in all conditions and offers great comfort over long distances.
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Excellent grip
- Protective and responsive cushioning
- Upper more comfortable than on the previous versions
- Sturdy shoe
CONS:
- High price
- The upper could be a little airier
The Hoka Mafate Speed 3 is a very comfortable trail running shoe that combines maximal cushioning, protection, and responsiveness.
★★★★★
More details + $169.95
The latest model in Hoka's Mafate Speed line-up is now available, and the vibrantly-colored 3 does not disappoint. With an improved upper and only slightly heavier design, we're about to weigh the pros and cons of this trainer—pun intended!
For starters, let's talk about the CMEVA midsole of the Speed 3. Nearly-identical to its predecessors (the EVO Mafate and Mafate Speed 2), it's built for cushioning your foot at high speeds with its blend of softness and snap. Even with a bit of added weight, the 3 is fast, though taller lugs may require some adjustment. Thanks to a roomy yet supportive mesh upper, feet remain secure while allowing for a bit of stretch. Compared with previous versions, runners referenced the new upper as the most significant improvement to the 3. Finally, the outsole—with sturdy, 5 mm lugs—are built for traction yet fell flat for some runners on slippery surfaces. These same lugs proved a bit too bulky for other users, especially on rocky or gravel surfaces. Testers reported the best performance once the lugs had been a bit worn-in.
A few complaints about the Speed 3 included lug height (as it threw off stability), and subsequently, added weight. Users clarified that this extra weight was unnoticeable while running downhill and that overall, the 3 offers a fast, smooth ride. Also, at 10.7 oz/303 g (M) for a heel stack height of 33 mm, the cushioning-weight ratio is not bad at all! Once the shoe is broken in, and the lugs are worn a bit down, this model is great for long-distance runners. Slippery and very technical surfaces pose some traction problems, but the MS3 performs very well in most trail scenarios.
Ultimately, the Mafate Speed 3 is a very good option for those with wider feet seeking a secure yet forgiving ride. Price-wise, this model falls on the higher end of the scale, but the combination of comfort and responsiveness is worthwhile!
For starters, let's talk about the CMEVA midsole of the Speed 3. Nearly-identical to its predecessors (the EVO Mafate and Mafate Speed 2), it's built for cushioning your foot at high speeds with its blend of softness and snap. Even with a bit of added weight, the 3 is fast, though taller lugs may require some adjustment. Thanks to a roomy yet supportive mesh upper, feet remain secure while allowing for a bit of stretch. Compared with previous versions, runners referenced the new upper as the most significant improvement to the 3. Finally, the outsole—with sturdy, 5 mm lugs—are built for traction yet fell flat for some runners on slippery surfaces. These same lugs proved a bit too bulky for other users, especially on rocky or gravel surfaces. Testers reported the best performance once the lugs had been a bit worn-in.
A few complaints about the Speed 3 included lug height (as it threw off stability), and subsequently, added weight. Users clarified that this extra weight was unnoticeable while running downhill and that overall, the 3 offers a fast, smooth ride. Also, at 10.7 oz/303 g (M) for a heel stack height of 33 mm, the cushioning-weight ratio is not bad at all! Once the shoe is broken in, and the lugs are worn a bit down, this model is great for long-distance runners. Slippery and very technical surfaces pose some traction problems, but the MS3 performs very well in most trail scenarios.
Ultimately, the Mafate Speed 3 is a very good option for those with wider feet seeking a secure yet forgiving ride. Price-wise, this model falls on the higher end of the scale, but the combination of comfort and responsiveness is worthwhile!
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Cushioning that combines shock absorption and responsiveness
- New and improved upper provides excellent foot lockdown while being comfortable
- Good overall grip
CONS:
- Lack of stability at times, according to some testers
- The grip is not optimal on very technical terrains
The Saucony Peregrine 11 is a reference trail running shoe to tackle the most technical terrains.
★★★★★
More details + $119.95
The Peregrine reigns over Saucony's trail range alongside the Xodus. It's a peppy shoe with fantastic versatility that continues to impress despite its persistent bulky weight.
The outsole and its lugs are almost identical to those of the P10—and still just as effective! They offer impeccable grip on the most technical surfaces. It's even possible to add ice screws if needed. Besides, there's the ST (Soft Terrain) version for soft surfaces such as mud. It comes with 6.5 mm lugs compared to 5 mm for the standard and GTX versions.
The stack height is higher than before, with 27 mm under the heel and 23 mm under the forefoot. The foam used is still PWRRUN with a similar medium density, slightly firm, cushioning. The midsole absorbs shocks well while still allowing some ground feel. This configuration is beneficial on technical terrain as it provides good stability while ensuring a smooth run.
Finally, like the rest of the shoe, the upper shows no radical change but rather small touches here and there, such as a thicker tongue and a better overlay system. It gives a secure lockdown and adequate ventilation with plenty of toe room—the forefoot part is not as roomy as an Altra, but it will fit most runners.
In summary, the Saucony Peregrine 11 continues to dominate the trail category with a powerful configuration for a wide range of terrains and situations thanks to its outstanding foot lockdown, protection, and grip. The slightly firm cushioning may not appeal to you if you like plush padding, but it's a matter of preference. This model's real weak point (as with its predecessors) is its weight, with 10.9 oz/310 g for men and 9.5 oz/270 g for women. Let's hope Saucony can hear us on that one!
The outsole and its lugs are almost identical to those of the P10—and still just as effective! They offer impeccable grip on the most technical surfaces. It's even possible to add ice screws if needed. Besides, there's the ST (Soft Terrain) version for soft surfaces such as mud. It comes with 6.5 mm lugs compared to 5 mm for the standard and GTX versions.
The stack height is higher than before, with 27 mm under the heel and 23 mm under the forefoot. The foam used is still PWRRUN with a similar medium density, slightly firm, cushioning. The midsole absorbs shocks well while still allowing some ground feel. This configuration is beneficial on technical terrain as it provides good stability while ensuring a smooth run.
Finally, like the rest of the shoe, the upper shows no radical change but rather small touches here and there, such as a thicker tongue and a better overlay system. It gives a secure lockdown and adequate ventilation with plenty of toe room—the forefoot part is not as roomy as an Altra, but it will fit most runners.
In summary, the Saucony Peregrine 11 continues to dominate the trail category with a powerful configuration for a wide range of terrains and situations thanks to its outstanding foot lockdown, protection, and grip. The slightly firm cushioning may not appeal to you if you like plush padding, but it's a matter of preference. This model's real weak point (as with its predecessors) is its weight, with 10.9 oz/310 g for men and 9.5 oz/270 g for women. Let's hope Saucony can hear us on that one!
PROS:
- The very comfortable upper offers an effective lockdown
- Comfortable, stable, and snappy cushioning
- Outstanding grip
- Excellent foot protection
CONS:
- Heavyweight
- The firm cushioning may not be suitable for everyone, especially for long distances
Specially created for Kilian Jornet, the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar is an ultralightweight competition trail running shoe.
★★★★★
More details +Salomon is a major player in trail running shoes. While the S/Lab Sense Pro held the top spot for a long time, there's a new little gem of technology to be reckoned with: the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar! This lightweight and seek competition trail shoe was designed in Annecy (France) at Salomon HQ for its top athletes like Kilian Jornet. So let's see if what's good for the elite is suitable for regular runners like you and me!
The first thing that stands out from all the reviews is that this shoe is incredibly lightweight: only 174 g/6.1 oz (men's model). Its sole is more flexible and slightly thicker than that of the S/Lab Sense 8. It uses a new foam: Energy Surge. We get a 14.5 mm stack height under the heel and 20.5 mm under the forefoot foot for a drop of 6 mm. Runners who have tried the shoe note that the cushioning is relatively firm while being comfortable. The sensations are excellent with a springy ride due to the foam, the low drop, and the nice ground feel. It also appears from the various tests that the rebound is excellent, which makes the shoe ideal for competition. However, the low stack height may limit the shoe's potential for long distances such as ultramarathon running, although it's a matter of personal preference. Also, let's note that several testers expressed concern about the durability of the midsole. It's a point to watch. It may be wise to use it primarily in competition and opt for a more robust model for daily training.
Regarding the upper, wide-footed runners found the Pulsar quite tricky to put on, as the collar is very narrow. As with all of Salomon's S/Lab models, QuickLace replaces the traditional laces. On this model, the eyelets have disappeared, and the lace goes directly into the fabric. We find a small pocket on the top to slip the excess laces, but some of the testers complained about the small size of this pocket. Trailers particularly appreciated the "mini-sock," which prevents the presence of dirt and gravel in the shoe. Overall, they noted an excellent lockdown, despite the lack of structure of the upper.
On the outer part of the sole is Contagrip, a blown rubber that equips most of the brand's trail running shoes. The design of the lugs and their depth suggest that this shoe will be more suitable for not too technical and not too wet terrain. This point is confirmed by several testers who noted a limited grip in the mud.
In summary, the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar an outstanding elite trail shoe to go fast on the trails. Though it was developed for and endorsed by superstar Kilian Jornet, all the testers had a lot of fun running with the Pulsar and felt they, too, could push their limits!
The first thing that stands out from all the reviews is that this shoe is incredibly lightweight: only 174 g/6.1 oz (men's model). Its sole is more flexible and slightly thicker than that of the S/Lab Sense 8. It uses a new foam: Energy Surge. We get a 14.5 mm stack height under the heel and 20.5 mm under the forefoot foot for a drop of 6 mm. Runners who have tried the shoe note that the cushioning is relatively firm while being comfortable. The sensations are excellent with a springy ride due to the foam, the low drop, and the nice ground feel. It also appears from the various tests that the rebound is excellent, which makes the shoe ideal for competition. However, the low stack height may limit the shoe's potential for long distances such as ultramarathon running, although it's a matter of personal preference. Also, let's note that several testers expressed concern about the durability of the midsole. It's a point to watch. It may be wise to use it primarily in competition and opt for a more robust model for daily training.
Regarding the upper, wide-footed runners found the Pulsar quite tricky to put on, as the collar is very narrow. As with all of Salomon's S/Lab models, QuickLace replaces the traditional laces. On this model, the eyelets have disappeared, and the lace goes directly into the fabric. We find a small pocket on the top to slip the excess laces, but some of the testers complained about the small size of this pocket. Trailers particularly appreciated the "mini-sock," which prevents the presence of dirt and gravel in the shoe. Overall, they noted an excellent lockdown, despite the lack of structure of the upper.
On the outer part of the sole is Contagrip, a blown rubber that equips most of the brand's trail running shoes. The design of the lugs and their depth suggest that this shoe will be more suitable for not too technical and not too wet terrain. This point is confirmed by several testers who noted a limited grip in the mud.
In summary, the Salomon S/Lab Pulsar an outstanding elite trail shoe to go fast on the trails. Though it was developed for and endorsed by superstar Kilian Jornet, all the testers had a lot of fun running with the Pulsar and felt they, too, could push their limits!
PROS:
- Very lightweight shoe (174g/6.1 oz!)
- Very comfortable
- Good grip overall
- Excellent responsive cushioning
- Effective lockdown despite the lack of structure of the upper
CONS:
- Difficult to put on, especially for runners with wide feet
- The grip can be limited on very technical terrain (mud, snow)
- Limited protection: no side guards, minimal toe cap
- Some doubts about the durability of the midsole
The Altra Olympus 4 is a very good trail running shoe that's ideal for long runs with its maximum cushioning and wid platform.
★★★★★
More details + $170.00
The Altra Olympus 4 is a trail shoe with a high-stack sole (33 mm), zero drop (so no offset between heel and toes), and a wide platform. This new version is more refined, however, which gives the shoe a more streamlined and less massive design. However, it retains the qualities that have made it so successful. Its high-stack cushioning ensures comfortable shock absorption throughout the run. Also, the running sensations are responsive with an enjoyable bounce. Of course, with its relatively heavy weight (318 g for men, 289 g for women), this is not a model made for speed and daring descents. The Olympus is a trail running cruiser that's all about comfort. It shows in the upper with a mesh that now has an open texture for better ventilation. The result is a pleasant and rather ample lockdown (be careful if you have narrow feet). The toe box is spacious as on all Altra models. Finally, the grip is very good with a Vibram MegaGrip rubber sole that features moderate lugs. The configuration is sturdy and can take a beating according to trailers who tested the shoe. Thus, the Olympus 4 is a comfortable option for medium difficulty trails (its ample foot lockdown and not-so-aggressive lugs don't make it the best choice for the most technical surfaces). A very good shoe for trailers looking for maximum comfort for their long trail runs.
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Maximalist and springy cushioning
- Comfortable upper with ample lockdown and spacious toe box
- Sturdy model
- Effective traction on intermediate level trails
CONS:
- Still on the heavy side
- High price
- May be insufficient on very technical trails
The Nike Pegasus Trail 3 is a comfortably cushioned and versatile shoe for terrains of moderate difficulty.
★★★★★
More details + $130.00
Don't have time to read the complete review analysis? Here's what you need to know.
The Pegasus Trail 3 is Nike's max cushioned trail running shoe with a 31 mm heel stack height featuring Nike React foam. The ride feels good at any pace with a slight bounce.
The main improvement on this new version is the new upper that offers a more precise foot lockdown for more stability. In addition, the design is top-notch, like the Terra Kiger or the Wildhorse.
The main downside of this trail running shoe, as with its predecessors, is its grip: traction is not optimal on tricky terrain like mud. However, it does allow you to venture out onto the asphalt, making it a good door-to-trail option if you want to run on both surfaces.
In summary, the Nike Pegasus Trail 3 is a very good comfortable, and versatile trail running shoe that's fun for most terrains but can fall short on technical ones.
Read the complete Nike Pegasus Trail 3 review analysis below for more information.
The Pegasus Trail 3 is Nike's max cushioned trail running shoe with a 31 mm heel stack height featuring Nike React foam. The ride feels good at any pace with a slight bounce.
The main improvement on this new version is the new upper that offers a more precise foot lockdown for more stability. In addition, the design is top-notch, like the Terra Kiger or the Wildhorse.
The main downside of this trail running shoe, as with its predecessors, is its grip: traction is not optimal on tricky terrain like mud. However, it does allow you to venture out onto the asphalt, making it a good door-to-trail option if you want to run on both surfaces.
In summary, the Nike Pegasus Trail 3 is a very good comfortable, and versatile trail running shoe that's fun for most terrains but can fall short on technical ones.
Read the complete Nike Pegasus Trail 3 review analysis below for more information.
PROS:
- Good comfort
- Improved upper for a more secure and comfortable fit
- Versatile shoe: it can venture out on the road and delivers a fun ride at any pace
- Comfy and rather snappy cushioning
CONS:
- The limited grip on technical surfaces like mud
What Are Trail Running Shoes?
Trail shoes are shoes made for running in natural environments like dirt roads and rugged paths in the forest or mountains. Trail running has gained a lot of popularity in the last few years, appealing to runners who want to combine the love of nature with running. One of the most famous races is the Ultra-Trail du Mont-Blanc. It goes around Mont Blanc through France, Switzerland, and Italy for a total distance of 171 km.
Trail shoes are ideal for running in the wilderness. To adapt to the most challenging conditions, they feature a special configuration that differentiates them from traditional road running shoes. The main differences are:
- Lugs: the outsole often features lugs for a good grip on the most difficult terrain, both downhill and uphill. It favors naturally grippy carbon-type hard rubber for optimal traction. Runners particularly appreciate Vibram rubber for its grip and abrasion resistance. This rubber has earned an excellent reputation, especially with its MegaGrip technology featured on many models.
- Protection: who hasn’t stubbed their toe in the corner of a table? Imagine the same thing at high speed with a sneaky rock or root. Trail running shoes aim to protect the foot from potentially dangerous or at least painful obstacles that athletes can encounter in nature. The upper is tough and durable to withstand impact and friction. There are also overlays sewn or fused to the upper for added protection. The collar slightly rises to wrap the foot, and the shoe’s point often features a toe cap. On the other hand, it’s increasingly common for trail running shoes to offer a rock plate. Inserted between the outsole and the midsole, it aims to protect the foot from sharp obstacles.
- Waterproofing: trail models often come with a water repellent finish. Some models even offer a Gore-Tex (GTX) membrane for advanced waterproofing. However, they are more expensive and heavier.
What Are the Different Types of Trail Running Shoes?
Like for road shoes, there are various trail running models to suit all preferences. Here are the main broad sets we distinguish:
- Minimalist shoes: popularized by Christopher McDougall‘s excellent book, Born to Run, this heterogeneous set of models shares a low stack height (less than 15mm). Thus, we find both sandals, thick socks, shoes with five fingers that look like foot gloves, and traditional shoes. Trail running is particularly suitable for minimalist running because of its natural surfaces. Indeed, the pressure on the joints is less strong than on the asphalt. That’s why ultramarathon (very long distance) running is mainly done on trail courses and not in the city. The main brands of minimalist shoes are Luna Sandals, Xero Shoes, and Merrell.
- Lightweight shoes: they offer a medium thickness sole (over 15 mm) but with a stripped-down configuration to go fast. These shoes are for trails without particular technical difficulty or for cross country that requires lightweight shoes to go as fast as possible. La Sportiva Kaptiva is a good example. There are also little gems of technology that manage to combine cushioning, grip, and lightweight, like the very good Salomon S/Lab Sense SG 8.
- “Classic” shoes: these offer a standard level of cushioning, grip, and protection to suit most people. The Brooks Cascadia and Salomon Speedcross are good examples of this with their medium stack, aggressive lugs, and protective uppers.
- Maximal cushioning shoes: this type of shoe has become very popular in recent years thanks to the thumbs up from famous athletes who proudly display them while competing in ultramarathon races. American athlete Karl Meltzer who gave his nickname to the Hoka One One Speedgoat comes to mind, or Anton Krupicka, who promotes the La Sportiva brand. The maximalist shoes feature a 30mm or more high stack sole for effective shock absorption. The most popular brand of maximal cushioning trail running shoes today is Hoka One One.
- Shoes for ice and snow: these models display deep aggressive lugs for a maximum grip, like the Salomon SnowSpike and SpikeCross shoes.
How to Choose The Right Shoes for Trail Running
To find the ideal model that’s right for you, you should first evaluate your goals, experience level, and preferences. Indeed, a model may suit one runner but displease another. Nevertheless, on the whole, there are reference models that can satisfy a large number of trailers with their excellent qualities.
Below you will find the main questions to ask yourself when choosing your shoes.
What types of terrain will I be running on?
The lugs and level of protection in trail running shoes vary depending on the type of terrain they are intended for. For example, there are trail shoes with thin lugs for easy trails. On the other hand, some models are made specifically for snow. Overall, the majority of models are designed to be suitable for ultra-trail running and thus offer a versatile configuration capable of tackling most terrains. Such is the case with the Hoka Speedgoat 4, one of the most popular shoes, which boasts a versatile configuration with 5mm lugs to ensure good grip on muddy ground and snow.
To help you out, here are some models categorized by the technical level of the trails they tackle.
Low to moderate technical level (dirt trails)
- Nike Pegasus Trail 2
- Salomon Sense Ride 4
Moderate to high technical level (rough, rocky trails)
- Saucony Peregrine 11
- Hoka One One Speedgoat 4
- Brooks Cascadia 15
Very high technical level (snow/ice)
- Salomon SnowSpike
- Minimalist – stack height of less than 15 mm
- Thin – 15 to 22 mm
- Medium – 23 to 26 mm
- Generous – 27 to 30 mm
- Maximal – over 30 mm
Minimalist, moderate or maximalist? What cushioning level should I choose?
This is primarily a matter of preference, but in some cases it can also influence your performance. The answer can vary greatly from runner to runner and change as you gain experience and refine your preferences. Essentially, ask yourself: do I prefer to feel the ground under my feet or do I prefer to avoid impact as much as possible?
If this is your first trail running shoe, we recommend opting for a similar level of cushioning as your road shoes. If this is your first pair of running shoes, in that case it is prudent to opt for an intermediate level of cushioning and refine your choice later.
On Runner’s Lab, we classify shoe cushioning according to the stack height under the heel. We thus distinguish five main categories:
Do I need waterproof shoes?
Most trail running models protect against moisture with varying levels of waterproofing. For example, the vast majority come with a water-repellent coating that repels minor water infiltration such as light rain or a brief trip through a shallow puddle. It’s often enough, especially since the shoes are designed to dry quickly. So even if you train every day, you’ll rarely have to put on wet shoes the next day. If you want to be fully protected, choose Gore-Tex or equivalent technology. However, it’s important to note that no shoe is entirely waterproof beyond a certain limit. A Gore-Tex shoe can usually withstand heavy rain for several hours at a time, but beyond that, it will rarely hold water ultimately. And that’s a good thing: a fully waterproof model wouldn’t allow for proper foot ventilation.
Visit this page to see the best trail running models available in Gore-Tex.
The Leading Trail Brands
There are many shoe brands that offer trail running models. Some started with road running before expanding their series to trail running while others have their roots directly in trail running. To keep things concise, here’s a list of ten popular brands that have been offering comfortable, high-quality trail models for many years (this is not a ranking, the order is alphabetical):
The Most Popular Shoes for Trail Running
Here are four models that have established themselves as references over the years. They are also versatile shoes that can suit the greatest number of trail runners no matter what the conditions.