The Best Road Running Shoes

Brooks Running is undoubtedly among the most respected brands out there regarding daily trainers and stability models. The Glycerin 19—available in both GTS (go-to-support)—is no exception and embodies Brooks's DNA perfectly. Those who tried the 19 had only good things to report!

As was just mentioned, the Glycerin 19 comes in GTS (go-to-support) and regular or neutral. The GTS version provides stability with its GuideRails system, which Brooks has also used on previous stability models. Runners reported that both the standard shoe and the Glycerin with GTS share a fantastic fit, smooth ride, and responsiveness. Both versions' general features are also equally strong—the midsole, for instance, ensures a soft but supportive ride. Crafted with DNA Loft technology, runners were satisfied with the exceptional cushioning of the 19. The weight remains reasonable despite the high stack (31 mm under the heel and 21 mm under the forefoot). The toe box and upper are roomy and breathable even with a second layer of mesh and accommodate wide feet. Finally, the outsole offers a good grip for both the GTS and standard versions of the 19. Runners remarked that they felt little variation between the two. The real difference lies in the GuardRails on the GTS version, which tries to keep knees stable and aligned. However, this technology works behind the scenes—it's not something that users noticed excessively throughout a run, which is rare enough to be mentioned as most support medial posts tend to be quite perceptible.

Ultimately, the Glycerin 19 is a good option for any long-distance runner seeking a cushioned and stable ride. Overall, it's not much different from its predecessors and ranks comparably in comfort and ride. The 19 certainly gets the job done but isn't a groundbreaking or fantastic trainer. The main disadvantage reported by testers is that this new Glycerin featured less rubber, which translates into more exposed foam and, unfortunately, signs of premature wear.

In conclusion, if you're a Brooks fan and are keen to try the latest in the Glycerin line-up, the 19 is a reliable, smooth, and no-frills option for daily runs. The GTS version can be appealing to runners looking for enhanced support.

The Asics Gel Kayano 27 is the model with the longest longevity in the Asics range with now 27 iterations to date. This classic was created by the product designer Toshikazu Kayano, who gave it his name. He is now retired, which says something about the age of this collection! So is the Kayano still worth the detour in 2020 or is it just a relic from another era? First of all, it should be noted that, though it hasn't lost weight (unfortunately), the shoe now has a more streamlined design to the point of resembling the Gel Cumulus 22. Thus, while still featuring as many technologies as before, it has a clean and compact design overall. The sole is relatively thin with 22 mm under the heel (24 mm for women) and 12 mm under the forefoot (11 mm for women). It features FlyteFoam and FlyteFoam Propel foams and GEL units for comfortable cushioning. According to the testers, the result is convincing without being really springy. Indeed, the Kayano is a stability shoe and, therefore, offers a traditional configuration that works to stabilize the foot while running to avoid overpronation. On this regard, the Dynamic DuoMax and the Space Trusttic technologies guide the foot softly. This will appeal to runners who are looking for a stability shoe that is not too strict. Therefore, the Kayano 27 is comfortable and stable with a secure foot lockdown. This configuration doesn't really shine during tempo sessions but is a solid choice for recovery training and long runs. Finally, the Kayano 27 is a sturdy shoe designed to last, which compensates a little for its high price tag. In summary, the Asics Gel Kayano 27 is a good stability shoe that offers a comfortable, robust and relatively flexible configuration.

Asics offers another option that runners (and their wallets) looking for a stable ride are sure to appreciate: enter the GT 1000 10. Technically an “entry-level” shoe with its 1000 delineation (connoting a basic stability trainer), this model still packs a punch performance-wise.

Like most Asics models, the GT 1000 10 is responsive and peppy while maintaining enough firmness for adequate support. It's primarily due to the FlyteFoam midsole, one of the flagship cushioning technologies of the Japanese brand that we find on many of its shoes, including the high-end ones. While FlyteFoam works well for many runners, some have reported excessive rigidity from this midsole technology, making long rides uncomfortable. However, this model is packed with GEL cushioning under the heel, improving the GT-1000 10’s energy return and shock absorption. The upper of the shoe is pretty standard, with mesh material and no overlays to enhance foot breathability. The outsole uses Asics High Abrasion Rubber—a carbon rubber that handles both wet and dry road conditions.

Since it's a stability model, it comes with a dense foam unit to guide the foot and center it while running. According to testers, it's not too intrusive and doesn't make the shoe too heavy: with 281 g/9.9 oz (men's version), it's relatively lightweight for a support model.

Those who tried the GT 1000 10 were happy with it, though they noted that this is not the shoe for full or half-marathons. This shoe provides an excellent ride for runners who participate in 5 or 10k races or enjoy shorter-distance runs. It’s even a great pick for new runners who are just getting their feet wet (no pun intended)! The only other notable comment was that this model tends to run on the wider side. Those with unusually narrow feet will need to tighten the laces for adequate stability or look for other options. In summation, the GT-1000 10 is available at an unbeatable price for the quality and stability it provides. It performs well for what it was designed to do, and we recommend it for casual, new, or short-distance runners.

The Asics Gel Cumulus 23 is a traditional running shoe for everyday training. With this new model, the Japanese brand succeeds in making significant changes while preserving the shoe's DNA.

The sole still has a moderate stack height with 23 mm under the heel (22 mm for women) and a heel-to-toe drop of 10 mm (compared to 9 mm previously). The testers noted that cushioning continues to provide ideal shock absorption with the FlyteFoam and GEL unit. This new Cumulus introduces the 3D Space Construction gender-specific design (inherited from the Lite line) to give a smoother ride that's also softer on the women version. The result is convincing, according to the testers. Overall, the Cumulus offers a nice ride, not really springy, but not dull either. The midsole density is moderate, so it's a good option for runners who like cushioning that's not too firm or too soft (or for beginners who aren't yet sure what their preference is).

The upper is simple and effective with a relatively thick engineered mesh that gives a precise and comfortable foot lockdown. Finally, as on most Asics models, the outsole features a lot of rubber for good durability.

To summarize, the Asics Gel Nimbus 23 should continue to delight the collection's fans. It's a good option for daily training at slow to moderate paces. Its weight is the main disadvantage with 10.2 oz/289 g (M), which limits its responsiveness and potential for speed.

The Topo Athletic Ultrafly 3 is comfortable stability shoe with moderate cushioning and roomy upper. Overall, runners have been quite pleased with this new model of the Ultrafly collection. While the stack height of the Ultrafly 3 has been increased by 2 mm, the shoe is actually even more lightweight than previously with 269 g/9.49 oz for men and 238 g/8.40 oz for women. The additional cushioning throughout really molds to the foot for added stability and comfort. Let's note here that the Ultrafly 3 is a stability shoe with a moderate level of correction for overpronation, which makes it suitable for all runners. Testers also greatly appreciated the fabulous upper-shoe padding and mesh design, which has been described as "transcendent". The shoe's toe box is also pleasantly roomy and pliable to accommodate a variety of foot types, setting it apart from running shoes with a narrow design that may be uncomfortable for those with wider feet. This is one of the signature characteristics of Topo Athletic who aims to craft simple, no-nonsense, and sturdy running shoes. Lastly, the tongue of the Ultrafly 3 is another superb aspect of the shoe's design, providing just enough cushioning to tighten laces for support without any discomfort or bulkiness. Also, this is one shoe you can trust to fit true to size. The only true complaint that users of the Ultrafly 3 voiced pertains to the overly-soft Zipfoam used in the design, which impedes the springiness of the ride. Otherwise, the Ultrafly 3 gets consistently good marks for its unparalleled upper shoe construction, well-cushioned midsole, and padded tongue that provides just enough comfort and security when lacing.

One thing's for sure about the Asics Gel Noosa Tri 13: you're not going to miss it in the street. Funhouse-vibrant and unmissable, with a design that somewhat resembles sidewalk graffiti, these trainers are triathlon-ready as well as tempo-optimal. Smooth, bouncy, and highly comfortable, this 13th iteration scores high on many points.

As always, we begin our shoe critique with a midsole analysis. Crafted with stable FlyteFoam technology, the midsole offers a comfortable, secure ride for an uptempo trainer. The foam itself is soft without being spongy and becomes firmer toward the heel of the shoe. With 4 mm more stack height than on the previous model, the midsole offers better support and accommodates nicely moderate and fast paces. Also, it has a rocker for fluid transitions from heel to toes. The consensus among runners is that the midsole is more a "tempo" shoe than a daily trainer but is versatile enough for both. The upper is described as "seamless," with a remarkable step-in feel and well-ventilated mesh fabric. The gusseted tongue is also unique, with tiny rubber bumps that make it easy to pull the shoe onto your foot. Lastly, the outsole is relatively average for an uptempo trainer; it grips the road just enough to be effective. The star of the show, though, is the foam midsole—and the outsole aims to enhance the midsole's feel.

There weren't many negative comments about the Noosa Tri 13. Some runners stated that its design was better-suited for fast runs than slow paces; others cautioned about adequate outsole traction. It isn't a shoe for very long runs, as runners reported foot fatigue due to the moderate stack height (25 mm under the heel, 20 mm under the forefoot). However, when used for short-medium tempo runs or a tri-leg, the Tri 13 can be more than classified as successful!

Asics Gel Noosa Tri 13 is available for a standard price compared with similar trainers. Given its strength of performance, it's worth consideration for triathletes and short-distance runners alike.

Brooks is back with its famous lightweight trainer, now available for the first time in GTS (stability version). The all-new Launch 8 is already creating a buzz in the running world and is noticeable a mile away! Available in lime green and a dusty rose hue, the benefits of the Launch 8 transcend outward appearance—this trainer performs. Whether opting for Brooks' Go-to-Support technology or the standard 8, here's what you should know to decide on using the Launch for your daily workouts.

Like some of its colleagues (we're looking at you, Glycerin 19), the Launch 8 comes in both neutral and GTS. GTS provides added support on the shoe's platform with GuideRails technology and works to stabilize a runner's stride. Unlike previous models that have offered GTS, the Launch 8 incorporates GuideRails technology seamlessly into the shoe's design. The overall feel is a firm, somewhat dense ride that gets the job done. The standard 8, meanwhile, lends itself to as smooth of a ride as its GTS cousin. The two share many similarities; both are leaning toward a more responsive feel and an uptempo pace. This responsiveness comes from the midsole, engineered with BioMoGo foam, though some runners were less than impressed. One comment focused on the overall stiffness of the shoe, even after a generous break-in period. BioMoGo also lacks pop, making it fairly unremarkable compared to the Brooks Tempo or Elite models' technology.

Also, the upper of the Launch 8 is designed with an air mesh to keep feet cooler. It's worth noting that, with a few exceptions, nearly all trainers have a breathable mesh upper—it pretty much comes with the territory. The toe box is roomy and keeps feet locked in place throughout a run. The outsole is excellent on both the standard and GTS versions, with blown rubber that lasts after miles of use. The overall traction and durability are unparalleled for the caliber and price point of the 8.

In summary, the Launch 8 is ideal for uptempo runners and those seeking a highly durable shoe. Despite some reported stiffness, users didn't have many other complaints; however, the midsole wasn't unanimously successful. Despite its lightweight design, BioMoGo was simply too firm for a comfortable ride. These are also not recommended for runners who expect a snap or "pep" in their step to propel them forward. For an extremely affordable price, given the great Brooks name and the shoe's quality, the Launch 8 delivers. However, if you are expecting something groundbreaking or truly remarkable, you would do well to look elsewhere.

The Altra Escalante 2 is a zero drop road shoe with a limited cushioning. Indeed, it has a relatively thin sole (19 mm) and no drop between the heel and the toes. Altra's goal is to create shoes that respect the anatomy of the foot and the human body in general as much as possible. The Escalante 2 fulfils this role well by offering an excellent feeling under the foot for running sensations close to minimalism. The previous model had received some criticism for its flexibility, which kept the foot a bit loosely. It seems that Altra has addressed this point as the support is now stricter, which may or may not be to the liking of every runner. According to athletes who have tested the Escalante 2, it is a fairly firm road shoe overall. On the other hand, it is worth noting that the shoe has gained weight (40 grams more) while reducing the cushioning (4 mm less sole thickness) which is a bit surprising and disappointing. To summarize, the Altra Escalante 2 is a good road shoe but this new version reveals some important changes that might not please fans of the previous model.

The Nike Revolution 5 is an entry-level road shoe with a stylish design. It offers a simple and functional configuration with a basic sole using rubber on the outside and EVA foam on the inside. The result is comfortable cushioning with all the responsive cushioning you need to have fun. The upper is also stripped down with a simple layer of knit. The ventilation is thus optimal but several runners have noted that the upper is unfortunately a little fragile. As you can see, the Nike Revolution 5 is a basic model that represents good value for money at around 50 pounds (60 dollars). Moreover, with 255 grams (men's version), it's a relatively lightweight model. It can be interesting to alternate with your main shoes during easy recovery workouts or to run at the gym on a treadmill. If you're looking for an inexpensive but slightly more advanced model, the Nike Legend React may also be a good choice.

The Brooks Ghost 13 is a sturdy running shoe with comfortable cushioning, particularly suitable for daily training. The collection continues its transformation with this new version, which keeps getting a little lighter and thinner. The shoe now weighs 280 g (9.9 oz) for men and 252 g (8.9 oz) for women, which is very reasonable considering the thickness of the sole (31 mm under the heel).

The cushioning is comfortable and effectively absorbs shocks throughout the run. It is important to note that the soft DNA Loft foam now extends over the entire lateral part of the shoe instead of being solely located in the heel as before. The firmer BioMoGo DNA foam is still present but on the medial part of the foot. The foams are co-molded to avoid a noticeable division line. The testers found the cushioning to be well balanced overall, except under the toes, where they found it too soft for optimal energy return. This is the main disadvantage of the shoe. However, this is consistent with its profile, primarily intended for medium and long distances at a slow to moderate pace. Besides, runners insist that the shoe provides a smooth ride with a good transition from heel to toe.

Moving on to the upper, the mesh is thinner and more flexible than any other Ghost model before. The toe area is remarkably flexible and spacious. This will appeal to runners with wider feet, but people with thin feet may float a little. Overall the lockdown is still very good. Note that the heel's collar is quite thick and rigid (which is very characteristic of the Ghost).

Finally, the outsole features thick rubber with deep grooves, making it durable, grippy, and even suited to easy dirt roads.

All in all, the Brooks Ghost 13 is a good and comfortable running shoe, not necessarily very exciting but reliable.

The Mizuno Wave Ultima 11 is a road shoe that offers more cushioning than the brand's other flagship model, the Wave Rider 23. The Ultima 11 features a 32 mm thick outsole with a 12 mm heel to toe drop. Cushioning is comfortable and offers an excellent running feel. The shoe is versatile and, therefore, suitable for all types of workouts. It was the official shoe of the Amsterdam Marathon in 2019 and is therefore designed especially for long road distances. However, despite good general comfort, it's a rather heavy shoe with 320 grams for men and 265 grams for women. Also, the toe area is a bit tight and might not be suitable for runners with wide feet. All in all, the Mizuno Wave Ultima 11 is a good, comfortable, reliable, and versatile road shoe despite its stocky build.

The Adidas SolarBoost 3 is, along with the UltraBoost, one of Adidas's most popular models. This new version focuses on delivering a steady and cushioned ride without being a stability shoe.

Like its colleague, the UltraBoost, the SolarBoost is heavy, with over 10.6 oz/300 g on the scale. Its three-piece midsole can explain this: Boost (of course) for cushioning, Control Rail for stability, and Linear Energy Push (LEP) for propulsion. The stack height is high with 32 mm under the heel and 22 mm under the forefoot. The result is medium density cushioning. Its main advantage is to absorb shocks and to be stable. For the rest, the feel is not very responsive. It's a pity because, according to the testers, the cushioning is rather unimpressive at low speed. You have to increase the pace to start enjoying the ride, but at the same time, with its weight, the SolarBoost is not a shoe for tempo runs either.

The upper offers an effective lockdown but is a bit stiff. Ventilation is good, and overlays and reinforcements enhance the engineered mesh structure. Finally, the Stretchweb Continental outsole is sturdy and provides good grip: you'll even be able to stray onto easy dirt roads.

In short, the Adidas SolarBoost is a shoe for athletes looking for adequate cushioning that's neither too soft nor too firm and stable. The shoe doesn't exactly shine, but at the same time, it doesn't disappoint either, and its durability helps justify its somewhat high price tag.