The Best Running Shoes: The Ultimate 2020 Ranking
Filter results
Showing all 7 results
The Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 is a very good trail running with effective grip to run long distances comfortably.
★★★★★
More details + $179.95
The Salomon shoe specially designed for ultra trail running is back. The S/Lab Ultra 3 is a versatile shoe favored by French star François d'Haene, a three-time UTMB winner. So what is this new version worth? First of all, the configuration remains almost identical in terms of weight and stack height. The grip is still excellent with the Contagrip rubber and its moderately aggressive lugs. The Ultra 3 is comfortable on most terrains, although testers note that deeper lugs would be welcome on steep and muddy routes. Also, as with previous versions, the configuration is robust and wear-resistant. In terms of cushioning, the stack height is moderate, with 26 mm under the heel and 18 mm under the forefoot. Trailers characterize the cushioning as "fairly firm" while offering good flexibility and shock absorption, which makes the ride enjoyable even over long distances. They also describe the feel of the run as springy, with smooth transitions throughout the run, even at low speeds. Then, the upper is softer with a streamlined, seamless design that gets rid of the "wings" of the previous model. The foot lockdown is great, resulting in a stable and safe run. Also, the upper is slightly more spacious (especially in the toe area), and its flexibility ensures good freedom of movement for the foot. The only negative point of the upper would be its lack of ventilation. Besides, despite all its great qualities, the shoe is on the expensive side with a base price of $180. In summary, the Salomon S/Lab Ultra 3 is a very good trail shoe that is comfortable in all conditions and offers great comfort over long distances.
PROS:
- Great comfort
- Excellent grip
- Protective and responsive cushioning
- Upper more comfortable than on the previous versions
- Sturdy shoe
CONS:
- High price
- The upper could be a little airier
The Nike Zoom Terra Kiger 6 is a lightweight trail running shoe with moderate and responsive cushioning.
★★★★★
More details + $99.93
The Nike Zoom Terra Kiger 6 is a lightweight trail shoe that offers a good balance between ground feeling and protection. Let's say it right away: this new version brings few fundamental changes after the thorough redesign of the previous model. If you liked the Kiger 5, you will not be disappointed by the K6. It features a dynamic and versatile cushioning that's ideal for tempo-style speed sessions on trails. The shoe offers good shock absorption without isolating the foot from the ground. With a stack height of 24 mm under the heel, cushioning is therefore moderate. However, it should be noted that some runners have found the heel particularly rigid which can be disconcerting given the flexibility of the forefoot. Then, traction is always very good on trails of medium technical difficulty. The moderately deep lugs give a good grip, especially in the mud. The non-slip rubber triangle in the middle of the outsole divides runners: some find it effective while others would prefer lugs as on the rest of the sole. Finally, the main change is in the upper. The support is now more precise without being strict. In addition, the toe box is also more spacious for more comfort. In summary, the Nike Zoom Terra Kiger 6 is a very good trail shoe that still offers a great ride for daily training. PROS
PROS:
- Good comfort
- Efficient traction
- Responsive cushioning
- Good foot protection despite the light profile of the shoe
- Stylish design
CONS:
- No lugs in the centre of the outsole (there is a non-slip strip instead)
- Heel a little too rigid according to some runners which differs from the flexibility of the rest of the platform
The Merrell MTL Skyfire is a lightweight trail running shoe to go fast downhill on the toughest terrains.
★★★★★
More details + $100.00
Buy now
Last price update was: April 21, 2021 11:46 am
Crafted specifically for taking on tough mountain trails, the Merrell MTL Skyfire is the perfect shoe for higher elevations and shorter running stints on uphill terrains. Its lightweight design (9 oz./242 g)
coupled with its great traction and breathable fabric makes the MTL Skyfire an extremely prudent choice for off-trail runners. Its stack dimensions are 23.5mm/17.5mm, with a drop of 6mm and lugs of 5 mm, to provide the best possible running conditions on rocky slopes. Runners who have tried the MTL Skyfire remarked that the sneaker was bouncy, comfortable, and provided a smooth running experience, though there is some discrepancy regarding adequate cushioning, which tends to be a stronger preference for female runners than male runners, according to recent studies. Runners have also stated that the MTL Skyfire is highly breathable, but that this design comes with the pitfall of absorbing a significant amount of moisture straight through to the foot on wet trails, or in rainy weather. MTL Skyfire users have also commented on the narrowness of the sneaker design, which is likely
intentional to provide a snug fit for added security on rocky trails. This may make the shoe a great option for runners with narrow to medium feet but may prove too tight for runners with wider feet. For best results, runners who tried the MTL Skyfire recommend tying the laces as tightly as possible for added heel and ankle protection, though this may be unsustainable and prove to be too uncomfortable for longer runs. Note that while the Merrell MTL Skyfire is ideal for shorter running sessions, cross-
country runners will likely do better with the sneaker's companion, the Long Sky. Runners were also a big fan of the Merrell MTL Skyfire's reasonable price of only $100, which is
relatively budget-friendly compared with other sneaker brands of the same high caliber.
Overall, the Merrell MTL Skyfire is a very good running shoe for off-trail, short-distance runners looking for a snug fit, lightweight design, above-average traction, and a great overall value! Longer-distance runners, or those who prefer a bit of extra cushioning, will do well to consider the brand's Long Sky option as an alternative.
PROS:
- Precise and safe foot lockdown
- Comfortable and springy cushioning
- Impeccable grip
- Lightweight
CONS:
- Narrow shoe, especially in the forefoot area
- Laces not very practical and not so easy to adjust to find the right level of tightening
The new Nike Air Zoom Terra Kiger 7 has more cushioning and protection to take on the most technical terrain.
★★★★★
More details + $139.95
Nike just released the Terra Kiger 7, and longtime fans are crying foul: this seventh version, much more cushioned, has little in common with the first models, they claim. So what's the verdict?
First, the new Terra Kiger is bulkier with a thicker sole and a roomier upper. Sadly, the weight has also gone up. The stack increased by 3 mm and is now 30 mm under the heel. In other words, after flirting with minimalism in its early days, the Terra Kiger has decided to supercharge its cushioning to go the distance. This new configuration has the advantage of offering comfortable cushioning in all circumstances. Also, the segmented rock plate provides a high level of protection for added safety. Trail runners note that the TK7 delivers comfortable cushioning while keeping its signature ground feel despite the higher stack. However, they didn't find the ride exceptionally responsive, even with the Zoom Air unit now located under the forefoot for a more effective toe-off.
Next, the outsole features more rubber and larger lugs for a more effective grip. Trailers criticized the non-slip diamond-shaped zone without lugs in previous models for its lack of effectiveness, and Nike has finally addressed the problem. Another improvement is that the rubber under the heel is less rigid, giving greater flexibility for a more stable grip.
Finally, the upper is roomier without sacrificing foot lockdown. The mesh/synthetic configuration with the Dynamic Fit system is secure even on difficult downhill paths.
In summary, the Terra Kiger series takes a new direction with this version 7. More cushioning, more protection, better grip: while some may regret the early lightweight days of the KT, many will be glad to take it for a spin on long and technical terrains.
First, the new Terra Kiger is bulkier with a thicker sole and a roomier upper. Sadly, the weight has also gone up. The stack increased by 3 mm and is now 30 mm under the heel. In other words, after flirting with minimalism in its early days, the Terra Kiger has decided to supercharge its cushioning to go the distance. This new configuration has the advantage of offering comfortable cushioning in all circumstances. Also, the segmented rock plate provides a high level of protection for added safety. Trail runners note that the TK7 delivers comfortable cushioning while keeping its signature ground feel despite the higher stack. However, they didn't find the ride exceptionally responsive, even with the Zoom Air unit now located under the forefoot for a more effective toe-off.
Next, the outsole features more rubber and larger lugs for a more effective grip. Trailers criticized the non-slip diamond-shaped zone without lugs in previous models for its lack of effectiveness, and Nike has finally addressed the problem. Another improvement is that the rubber under the heel is less rigid, giving greater flexibility for a more stable grip.
Finally, the upper is roomier without sacrificing foot lockdown. The mesh/synthetic configuration with the Dynamic Fit system is secure even on difficult downhill paths.
In summary, the Terra Kiger series takes a new direction with this version 7. More cushioning, more protection, better grip: while some may regret the early lightweight days of the KT, many will be glad to take it for a spin on long and technical terrains.
PROS:
- Good comfort
- Protective shoe
- Comfortable cushioning with a nice ground feel
- Precise foot lockdown
CONS:
- Heavier than previous models
The Nike Wildhorse 7 is a comfortable and versatile shoe to have fun on the trails. Review analysis coming soon!
★★★★★
$129.95
The Altra Lone Peak 5 is a sturdy zero drop trail shoe that offers grip and protection.
★★★★★
More details + $129.95
Integer models are generally synonymous with significant change at Altra. Therefore, trailers expected a lot from the Altra Lone Peak 5. Unfortunately, despite some noteworthy improvements, it's an aging model that's struggling to make its mark beyond the brand's fan base. Explanations.
The Lone Peak 5 is, like the other Altra models, a zero-drop shoe without an offset between the heel and the forefoot. The shoe has a medium stack height of 25 mm. According to the testers, cushioning is comfortable with the right balance between softness and firmness. Also, while the rock plate on the 4.5 version was not very effective, StoneGuard proves to be more useful on the 5 without impacting comfort.
The grip is still at its best with a new and improved lugs configuration. Trailers who have tried the shoe have found it to be effective even on snow. So it's a faultless record on this front. And as usual, Altra delivers a tough shoe that can take a lot of punishment and will last you a while.
It's with the upper that things get complicated. One of Altra's significant strengths—a comfortable lockdown with a large box to splay your toes—is a disadvantage on the LP5. According to the testers, the mesh is too loose and without enough structure to ensure a precise foot lockdown. The shoe is so wide that users recommend sizing down. Therefore, while the shoe may be suitable for people with wider feet, it may be tricky for the rest.
In short, the Altra Lone Peak 5 is a good trail shoe that lives up to the spirit of the brand: a wide upper, flawless grip, and a resilient outsole. However, the tricky loose fit makes it hard to recommend it.
The Lone Peak 5 is, like the other Altra models, a zero-drop shoe without an offset between the heel and the forefoot. The shoe has a medium stack height of 25 mm. According to the testers, cushioning is comfortable with the right balance between softness and firmness. Also, while the rock plate on the 4.5 version was not very effective, StoneGuard proves to be more useful on the 5 without impacting comfort.
The grip is still at its best with a new and improved lugs configuration. Trailers who have tried the shoe have found it to be effective even on snow. So it's a faultless record on this front. And as usual, Altra delivers a tough shoe that can take a lot of punishment and will last you a while.
It's with the upper that things get complicated. One of Altra's significant strengths—a comfortable lockdown with a large box to splay your toes—is a disadvantage on the LP5. According to the testers, the mesh is too loose and without enough structure to ensure a precise foot lockdown. The shoe is so wide that users recommend sizing down. Therefore, while the shoe may be suitable for people with wider feet, it may be tricky for the rest.
In short, the Altra Lone Peak 5 is a good trail shoe that lives up to the spirit of the brand: a wide upper, flawless grip, and a resilient outsole. However, the tricky loose fit makes it hard to recommend it.
PROS:
- Comfortable cushioning
- Effective foot protection
- Great grip
- Very durable shoe
CONS:
- Loose and imprecise fit
- High weight to stack height ratio
The Brooks Divide 2 trail shoe that moonlights as a road shoe (or the other way around).
★★★★★
More details + $100.00
The Divide 2 is Brooks' jack of all trades model that seeks to enable seamless transitions from pavement to trails. As a hybrid shoe, Brooks delivers a reliable shoe with the 2 to continue the first Divide model and its versatility goals. However, by trying to do everything, it may end up not being truly good at anything.
The shoe's midsole is a bit harder than is comfortable for standard road running. While BioMoGo DNA cushioning is usually comfortable, testers found it clunky and too firm on the Brooks Divide 2, overall feeling a bit too heavy for ideal road mileage. The plastic rock plate enhances foot protection but ultimately reduces flexibility and makes the ride stiff. According to users, the upper is made well with an air-mesh material and fits true-to-size, but according to users is nothing special. The outsole is really the star of the show, with a lug pattern and tacky grip that guarantees good traction. Smaller lugs make road running possible while still performing well on technical terrain.
Unfortunately, the Divide 2 fell flat for runners in quite a few areas. Perhaps the biggest complaint among users was that the overall design is simply too weighted and clunky. Weighing 10.3 oz/292 g (M) and 9.2 oz/261 g (W), these numbers aren't atypical for trail shoes but are undeniably on the heavier side for road shoes. Some compared the hardness of the midsole to a "brick-like" feel. Other runners noted that the fit was not secure, as there isn't adequate collar padding for lock-in.
Overall, testers described the Brooks Divide 2 as a good shoe for road runners interested in some trail work (and vice versa). However, for those used to a softer ride, this is one shoe that may prove too firm. One positive point is that it is priced on the lower side, which is great for the versatility it supposedly provides. That said, we wouldn't necessarily recommend the Divide 2 for security or longer road jaunts.
The shoe's midsole is a bit harder than is comfortable for standard road running. While BioMoGo DNA cushioning is usually comfortable, testers found it clunky and too firm on the Brooks Divide 2, overall feeling a bit too heavy for ideal road mileage. The plastic rock plate enhances foot protection but ultimately reduces flexibility and makes the ride stiff. According to users, the upper is made well with an air-mesh material and fits true-to-size, but according to users is nothing special. The outsole is really the star of the show, with a lug pattern and tacky grip that guarantees good traction. Smaller lugs make road running possible while still performing well on technical terrain.
Unfortunately, the Divide 2 fell flat for runners in quite a few areas. Perhaps the biggest complaint among users was that the overall design is simply too weighted and clunky. Weighing 10.3 oz/292 g (M) and 9.2 oz/261 g (W), these numbers aren't atypical for trail shoes but are undeniably on the heavier side for road shoes. Some compared the hardness of the midsole to a "brick-like" feel. Other runners noted that the fit was not secure, as there isn't adequate collar padding for lock-in.
Overall, testers described the Brooks Divide 2 as a good shoe for road runners interested in some trail work (and vice versa). However, for those used to a softer ride, this is one shoe that may prove too firm. One positive point is that it is priced on the lower side, which is great for the versatility it supposedly provides. That said, we wouldn't necessarily recommend the Divide 2 for security or longer road jaunts.
PROS:
- Good protection
- Effective grip
- Affordable shoe
- Versatile for runners alternating between road and trail
CONS:
- Rigid platform
- Clunky and dull cushioning