The Best Running Shoes: The Ultimate 2020 Ranking

After the FuelCell TC— New Balance's first shoe to show off a carbon plate—here's the FuelCell RC Elite, a shoe whose keywords are comfort and versatility.

It comes with a high-stack cushioning with a height of 35 mm under the heel and 25 mm under the forefoot. The FuelCell foam gives a soft and plush cushioning with a firm touch under the heel. The soft feel of the sole is very similar to that of the Adidas Adios Pro. The result is a very comfortable ride, but the testers judged the bounce to be moderate. The carbon plate—discreet under the foot—does its job and provides a responsive ride with fast transitions but maybe not as impressive as on other similar models (like the Nike AlphaFly, to name only one). Therefore, the ride is actually close to what you get from a traditional running shoe, making it an exciting option for runners looking for a more accessible, more comfortable carbon plated shoe.

Next, the mesh of the upper is soft and relatively thick for a racing shoe, which reinforces the overall feeling of comfort. The shoe fits true to size, but the lockdown is a little loose in the middle of the foot, according to several runners. It's one of the main issues of this model: runners are concerned that it may not be secure enough for racing. The toe box offers enough room, and the heel counter perfectly locks-in the foot. The design is very nice with a sleek build and bright neon colors, although, of course, it's a matter of preference.

Finally, the Dynaride outsole and its small triangular rubber lugs give good traction and seem durable: testers didn't notice any signs of wear after several runs. Besides, the lugs also equip the tip of the shoe to act as a toe bumper that protects the toes and makes the shoe more sturdy.

To summarize, the FuelCell TC is a great carbon plate running shoe with a soft and flexible platform that received high praise from many seasoned runners. Its combination of performance and comfort make it a very versatile shoe. Make no mistake though: it's a shoe built for marathon racing, but it's also suitable for daily training.

While not the first Asics shoe to feature a carbon plate, the MetaSpeed Sky is the first in this category with high stack cushioning (33mm under the heel) for the Japanese brand.

The MetaSpeed Sky results from Asics' research. They concluded that athletes could be classified into two categories: those who increase their stride and those who raise their cadence to go faster. The Sky targets the first category, while another model, the MetaSpeed Edge, should be released soon to target the second. So what's the MetaSpeed Sky worth, and is it right for you?

The midsole uses a new nylon-based foam: FF (for FlyteFoam) BLAST TURBO. It's pretty firm without being harsh. Thus, the testers noted that the sole's density is similar to that of the Saucony Endorphin Pro but a little softer. The carbon plate is most noticeable under the heel and midfoot, while the forefoot is softer. Despite the narrow heel, athletes rated the stability as good. According to runners, the rockered design of the sole gives a rather abrupt rocking effect. So while some shoes provide a smooth transition, the MetaSpeed Sky's rolling motion is as sudden as it is effective. So the best is to test it out and see if it works for you. In any case, it reinforces the overall impression of the shoe: this is a model to go fast, very fast. Forget daily training; this is a pure competition shoe. The low drop (5 mm) doesn't improve the versatility: at low speeds, the heel feels heavy and requires a fast pace to activate this "super shoe." Overall, testers unanimously liked the MetaSpeed Sky's explosive cushioning.

Next, the single-layer mesh provides an effective lockdown with just the right amount of space. On that last point, some users found the toe box a bit too roomy. So be careful if you have narrow feet. If you have wide feet, you can count your blessings! Also, the upper's simple design, without overlays, makes it not very pliable to keep the foot in place better. In short, we recognize the know-how and quality of Asics. Finally, the outsole features the ASICSGRIP rubber developed primarily for the trail running collection of the brand. It proves to be both grippy and durable. At first glance, it would seem that the MetaSpeed Sky is one of the most robust "super shoes." To be confirmed, though.

All in all, it took Asics a while to respond to the challenge posed by Nike's "FLY" (the MetaRacer had a much thinner sole, putting it in a category of its own), but it's safe to say that the MetaSpeed Sky doesn't fall short with its cutting-edge configuration. This shoe is for you if you're looking for an elite model to shatter your records over long distances like the marathon.

Adidas is making a big splash for the start of the Autumn season with the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro, its second shoe to use a carbon plate. Like its direct competitors (such as the Nike Alphafly or the Brooks Hyperion Elite 2), the Adios Pro features a very high-stack cushioning to run comfortably long and fast.

When we mentioned that the Adios Pro featured a carbon plate, we only told half of the story (or even less). Indeed, the shoe has not one but six plates! First, there's a carbon-infused nylon plate under the heel to improve stability and compensate for the narrow profile of the rearfoot. Second, there are five "EnergyRods" made of carbon-infused TPU that support the toes to promote smooth transitions and a springy ride. These propulsion plates are surrounded by the new Lightstrike Pro foam, which is very flexible. The result is a high stack sole with 39 mm of height under the heel and 31 mm under the forefoot. The testers found the outcome breathtaking in terms of performance and running sensations. Indeed, they noted "fast transitions" from heel to toe and a perfect balance between softness and bounce. In other words, the feel is soft and plush with the Lightstrike Pro foam, but the carbon plates give good structure and a natural impulse while running. The only downside is the weight of the foam, which is heavier than that of its competitors (such as Nike's ZoomX). The shoe is far from being heavy, but it is not as light as one would expect from this high-tech racing shoe.

The Adidas Adizero Adios Pro also shines thanks to its Celermesh upper that offers amazing foot lockdown with its unique design. Also, it provides excellent airflow throughout the run and features a roomy toe-box without reducing lockdown. The only criticism we've seen is that the collar could irritate the Achilles tendon, but this may be an isolated incident.

Finally, the outsole is rugged rubber but with a surprisingly flat sandpaper-like surface. Rest assured, however, the testers didn't find that this configuration diminished durability or grip—quite the contrary!

In summary, the Adidas Adizero Adios Pro is an excellent running shoe to go fast comfortably that offers a unique and impressive configuration, especially with the EnergyRods carbon plates under the toes. The comfort is there, and the cushioning is spectacular, according to the runners who have tested the shoe.

With the Endorphin Pro, Saucony enters the highly-competitive carbon plate running shoe category that has been dominated head and shoulders by Nike so far.

It's a lightweight shoe (221 grams for men, 190 grams for women) with a thick sole (35 mm under the heel) that features a brand new cushioning technology: PWRRUN PB. It translates into Pebax fused granules with a texture reminiscent of Adidas Boost. Inside, the carbon plate is there to make the ride more responsive by facilitating a snappy rebound. So what's the verdict?

First of all, what surprised testers the most was the firmness of the cushioning despite the high stack height. They note that the cushioning is very bouncy but without offering the "trampoline" effect of the Nike ZoomX Vaporfly NEXT%. This configuration has the advantage of giving a more stable and natural ride with a good ground feeling. It may not perform as well as the Nike Vaporfly—only time will tell—but overall, Saucony's approach is convincing and original.

Regarding the upper, the FORMFIT mesh gives a strict foot lockdown for more safety when you go fast. The runners were impressed by the excellent ventilation of the foot during the effort. However, the shoe has a tapered profile, so it can be too narrow if you have wider feet.

Finally, the carbon rubber of the outsole ensures good durability and excellent traction on urban surfaces.

All in all, the Saucony Endorphin Pro is a very good carbon-plate running shoe that's already a solid contender to Nike's NEXT% collection.

It took a bit of time for Adidas (and other brands, by the way) to respond to Nike and its carbon propulsion plate shoes which really turned the world of running upside down by introducing an incredible joker. A technology that has proven to be able to significantly improve athlete performance by promoting better propulsion. Adidas' answer is called the Adizero Pro and the wait was worthwhile. It's lightweight and at the same time a little heavier than its direct competitors with 235 g (8.3 oz) for men and 218 g (7.7 oz) for women. At first glance, the shoe looks a lot like the Adizero Adios 5 but much more streamlined. The cushioning configuration is very similar as it uses the Boost and Lightstrike foams. What differentiates it is its secret weapon: Carbitex, a carbon propulsion plate. This one is spoon-shaped and relatively soft compared to those of its competitors (like the Nike ZoomX Vaporfly NEXT% or the Saucony Endorphin Pro). This allows a greater range of motion, especially in the forefoot area, for a more springy ride during toe-off. Testers were impressed with the effectiveness of this configuration. According to them, the shoe is great for any distance by allowing for a more fluid ride, as long as you pick up the pace. Furthermore, the sole has a generous stack height while being fairly firm, which gives better stability. Next, the one-piece Celermesh upper is elegant and very comfortable. It's very similar to the Adizero Adios' upper but thinner. The lockdown is well adjusted while providing enough room for the toes. Finally, let's take a moment to appreciate the effectiveness of the outsole. It is an element that goes a little unnoticed on road shoes (unlike trail shoes) but here the Continental and Adiwear rubbers provide both great grip and durability. Also, the Quickstrike DSP nods provide better traction on slippery surfaces such as athletic tracks. The result is impressive and should allow you to keep the Adizero Pro longer than a traditional carbon plate competition shoe. In summary, the Adidas Adizero Pro is a very good running shoe with a carbon plate for speed. Its cushioning and sturdy construction makes it suitable for all types of training – as long as you go fast!

Renowned for its stylish sneakers, Puma is a bit of an underdog brand when it comes to running shoes. Big names like Nike and Asics usually dominate the field, with Puma regarded as a second-tier option. However, the Puma Deviate NITRO shoe is gaining traction and is the brand's continued attempt at a comeback. If Olympian marathon runner Molly Seidel is a Puma fan, after all, they must make a pretty solid shoe!

First things first: let's talk about the NITRO midsole. Nitrogen-infused with a noticeable bounce, the midsole foam is soft and responsive. The overall sensation is springy, with a natural "pop" that occurs through toe-off. The NITRO foam is layered around a carbon plate to increase responsiveness. There's also a TPU plate at the rear to compensate for the softness of the foam. Among the runners who tried the shoe, the midsole was definitely a hit. Many of them noted the versatility of the shoe that's suitable for daily runs and racing alike. Also, while many carbon-plated shoes are overly stiff, the NITRO is quite soft.

The upper of the shoe generated positive feedback, with the general agreement that its mesh fabric is highly breathable. The design also accommodates wider feet, which will be a plus for some runners. For the NITRO model's outsole, Puma uses a rubber compound they call PUMAGRIP, which runners agree gets the job done. Even when running in wet or slippery conditions, PUMAGRIP offers enough traction for a successful ride.

While the Deviate NITRO may be a suitable option for long-distance runners, some users noted some technical problems with the shoe. One of the biggest issues reported was frequent heel slipping, which irritated even through thicker socks. Additionally, the NITRO doesn't always feel the most stable—likely due to the shoe's high stack (32 mm heel height) combined with the soft NITRO foam. Even with the laces tightened, a few runners reported an overall jolty ride due to a lack of stability.

Ultimately, the Deviate NITRO is no gold medalist but may perform perfectly well for you based on your running goals. It's especially suitable for runners looking for a carbon-plate model for their daily workouts. Also, its fairly standard price point makes it a good bang for your buck.

The Hoka One One Carbon X was the first shoe of the brand to feature a carbon plate. One year later, Hoka persists and signs with this resolutely firm model despite some signs of softening.

First of all, we must put the Carbon X 2 in the context of 2020. After the rush for carbon footwear in 2018/2019, the novelty stage has passed. We are now spoilt for choice, with every major brand offering at least one carbon-fiber plate model. In this regard, the weight of the Carbon X 2 is in the high range with 239 g/8.4 oz (men's model). In comparison, the Adidas Adios Pro weighs 224 g/7.9 oz and the Nike Alphafly 229 g/8.0 oz despite their high stack height close to 40 mm.

The Hoka Carbon X 2 offers a thinner sole than before with 32 mm for men and 30 mm for women under the heel with a 5 mm drop. The cushioning of the PROFLY X midsole and its CMEVA foam is softer but remains firm overall. The carbon plate, which was very stiff on the first model, is also a bit more flexible, which gives a smooth but less propulsive ride than before, according to the testers. Also, the softer cushioning reduces the ground feel. Overall, this slight configuration change provides greater comfort and versatility for longer runs.

Next, the upper remains very similar to the first model, but with a new sleek flared heel. It was well-received overall, especially because of its padding that locks-in the heel comfortably in the shoe. Besides, the mesh is a little thicker, which makes it more resistant than before. The result is a tighter lockdown. The testers praised this improvement, noting that it makes the shoe more suitable for racing. Finally, the wide, foam-rich "Swallow Tail" heel adds stability. It's specially designed for runners who heel strike (the majority) and provides more comfortable cushioning upon landing. However, if you forefoot or midfoot strike, the benefit may be minimal, and the bulky piece may even weigh you down for nothing.

When it comes to durability, the rubberized foam of the outsole is frankly not ideal for high-mileage runners. For example, some users have noticed wear signs after about 250 km/155 mi, which is not great considering the shoe's price. Unfortunately, it's often the case with this type of shoe.

In summary, the Hoka Carbon X 2 remains true to the first model with a firm and springy cushioning that lends itself well to long distances. However, the shoe seduces without impressing, and its durability limits its versatility. In other words, it lacks this WOW factor to instantly turn heads. Hoka fans, go for it! For others, take the time to compare with other carbon-fiber plate shoes to determine what suits you best.

We have just unpacked the first model, and Brooks is already back with a second version! The Hyperion Elite had received mixed reviews, with many criticizing its firm and dull cushioning. Also, durability wasn't there—the brand itself admitted that the shoe had a lifespan of 150 km (!). Brooks seems to have corrected this by reinforcing the sole with more rubber. Without being sturdy, the testers note that this new model should withstand more kilometers than the first one.

The Cushioning has softened and offers greater bounce. The sole is 37 mm thick under the heel with an offset of 8 mm. Brooks has replaced the short-lived DNA Zero foam with DNA Flash, which translates into an even more densely compressed texture to promote a more explosive energy return while running. And, of course, there's the carbon plate to guide runners to a smoother, faster run that requires less effort. Reviewers found the result convincing. They especially appreciated the stable and wide configuration of the platform. Without providing the same level of bounce as some of its competitors like the Nike Alphafly or the Saucony Endorphin Pro, the Brooks Hyperion Elite 2 puts on a good show. The ride is something very personal, so it's a shoe that could appeal to athletes who didn't like these other models.

Moving on to the upper, the stretch woven mesh is comfortable and well ventilated while providing precise foot lockdown. Moreover, it is remarkably roomy to please runners with wider feet. However, despite these pros, some testers did not like certain details. For example, the heel now features a moderately thick layer that some runners found irritating to the tendon. Similarly, the thin tongue tends to move while running, which is not convenient.

Overall, the Brooks Hyperion Elite 2 is a clear step up over the first model. Its comfort and springy cushioning make it a great running shoe for competition despite some flaws.

The Rocket X is Hoka One One's new carbon-fiber plate running shoe. It features a classic, simple, and sleek design with the marathon in mind. As we'll see, its specific configuration can be very effective but not necessarily suitable for everyone.

First of all, the Hoka Rocket X is closer to a classic racing shoe than a carbon plate model. The semi-rigid carbon-fiber unit is unobtrusive and offers good bounce without the "trampoline" effect of other carbon shoes—many testers compare the Rocket X to the Saucony Endorphin Pro in terms of the ride but find the latter smoother overall. The CMEVA midsole has a stack height of 32 mm under the heel and 27 mm under the forefoot and offers a simple and effective cushioning, described by testers as firm and moderately springy. It doesn't have much to do with the signature Hoka plush cushioning. However, it seems that the platform's firmness and the low drop (5 mm) limit the shoe's versatility. According to the runners, it takes a quick pace to "activate" the carbon plate's propulsion benefit. The Rocket X is equipped with Meta-Rocker technology, but it's not very effective on this model. According to several testers, it's best to forefoot strike to get the most out of this shoe. However, most runners are heel strikers, which reduces the potential audience of the Rocket X.

Next, the lightweight and breathable mesh of the upper offers precise and flexible foot lockdown: the ideal configuration to combine comfort and race-ready fit. Also, the heel counter is soft and not too high, which will please runners with Achilles problems. The toe box is moderately spacious and should not be a concern for runners with wider feet.

Finally, the rubber outsole is grippy enough despite its seemingly smooth texture and is sturdy enough to withstand wear and tear.

To summarize, the Hoka Rocket X is a good carbon-fiber plate racing running shoe. Still, its particular configuration—which favors forefoot strikers—isn't versatile enough to rival carbon plate champions like the Nike AlphaFly or the Adidas Adios Pro, especially over long distances. However, it can be an interesting option if you are looking for a simple yet edgy carbon plate competition shoe for short or medium distances.

With a sleek and rockered design, the Flight VECTIV is the first shoe in a new line of North Face runners. First trail shoe to feature carbon-fiber plate, its unique cushioning will surprise many runners, especially from a brand not well-known for footwear. Moreover, the VECTIV is unique because it performs as a hybrid, working equally well on roads as on trails.

Perhaps most notable about the Flight VECTIV is its dual-density foam midsole that gives this model its name. This cushioning, combined with a full-length 3D carbon-fiber plate, provides a smooth toe-off and works effortlessly on more technical terrain. Runners describe the overall feel of the ride as "flowy" and "synergistic." Part of the experience comes from the upper, which has a nice elastic tension that gives a gusseted-tongue-like sensation. Its mesh fabric ensures breathability while cradling and supporting the foot. Of course, combined with the strong midsole and upper of VECTIV is an equally impressive outsole that rivals many top trail shoes. The SurfaceCTRL outsole delivers a solid performance on most trail terrains, despite its lugs' modest profile (3.5 mm).

While most runners were impressed with the shoe's overall feel and performance, it does lose points for accessibility. Designed mostly for narrower feet, the VECTIV is probably an unsuitable choice for those with average to wide feet. Surprisingly, runners also remarked that the upper isn't remarkably durable, lasting only 50 miles before noticeable wear and tear. It's incredibly disappointing considering all the fuss with the Matryx material of the upper that uses Kevlar. Lastly—though more of an aesthetic gripe than anything else—the sharp white of the shoe is quickly and easily tarnished. As a trail shoe, don't expect the sleek look of the VECTIV to hold up for long before getting dirty.

In summation, the North Face's latest contribution to the running world passes with flying colors. VECTIV is a solid choice for runners with narrow feet and performs well on roads and trails alike. It's a pricey shoe for those who don't spend much time on technical terrain; nevertheless, it's worth the splurge for anyone with a need for speed on the trails.