Asics GT 1000 12 vs 2000 12: Which Stability Shoe? (2024 Comparison)
The GT 1000 and GT 2000 are popular pronator running shoes in the Asics range. The GT 1000 is the entry-level series, and the GT 2000 is the next in the collection. The 2000 is slightly more expensive, but this may change during promotional periods.
First of all, the GT 1000 offers a more basic configuration. For example, it doesn’t feature the new FLYTEFOAM BLAST PLUS high-end foam (lighter and more bouncy) to improve comfort and rebound.
The same goes for the support: the GT 2000 12 has switched to 3D Guidance System, while the GT 1000 12 keeps LITETRUSS. The former technology provides a more natural and complete guidance overall. In terms of experience, the GT 2000 offers a little more support than the GT 1000, but this is subjective and may vary from one runner to another.
Next, in terms of cushioning, the new versions of these shoes offer rather high stack cushioning with 32.5 mm under the heel for the GT 1000 and 36 mm for the 2000. The former gives a firm feel, while the latter is softer.
The drop has been reduced to 8 mm, which is lower than in the past while remaining standard and accessible to most runners.
GT 1000 or 2000: Which One to Choose?
In short, both shoes are comfortable stability shoes for overpronators.
However, the 2000 is a bit more sturdy and more comfortable thanks to its premium and more responsive midsole foam. Also, it offers slightly more support than the GT 1000 12.
Side-By-Side Comparison
|
9  |
8.4  |
|
|---|---|---|
| Overview | ||
| Description | The Asics GT 1000 11 is a soft and comfortable entry-level stability shoe that will suit most, bringing welcome improvements from the previous version. | Asics GT 2000 11 is a decent upgrade to the popular mid-level stability shoe series with notably better responsiveness. |
|
10
8
9
9.5
8.5
10
8
|
9
8
9
8
9
8.5
7.5
| |
| Facts | ||
| Terrain | Road | Road |
| Support | Neutral | Overpronation (stability) |
| Heel stack height | 21 mm | 23 mm |
| Forefoot stack height | 13 mm | 15 mm |
| Heel-to-toe drop | 8 mm | 8 mm |
| Weight (men) | 269 g | 275 g |
| Weight (women) | 224 g | 235 g |
| Features | Recycled materials | |
| Athletes | ||
| Release year | 2022 | 2023 |
| Technologies | ||
| Outsole | AHAR, AHARPLUS | AHARPLUS Rubber |
| Midsole | FLYTEFOAM™, Rearfoot GEL, LITETRUSS | FLYTEFOAM, FF BLAST, Rearfoot GEL, LITETRUSS, OrthoLite X-30 Sockliner |
| Upper | Engineered Mesh, External Heel Counter | Jacquard Mesh |
| Cushioning | ||
| Cushioning | Balanced | Balanced |
| Responsiveness | Medium | Medium |
| Use | ||
| Distance | Short, 5K, Mid, 10K | Short, 5K, Mid, 10K, Half marathon |
| Speed | Slow, Moderate | Slow, Moderate |
| Workouts | Daily running | Daily running |
